[Int-area] Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier in Shared Address Deployments I-D

<mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> Fri, 10 June 2011 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5BD11E8083; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXXnCCAa-7bz; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1580911E807E; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.199]) by omfeda14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id F2BB12AC415; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:53:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.30]) by omfeda06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CE042C805C; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:53:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by PUEXCH41.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.30]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:53:20 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
To: "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, 'Behave Chairs' <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:53:18 +0200
Thread-Topic: Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier in Shared Address Deployments I-D
Thread-Index: AcwnZP1jDfelOgRuT1G1WudO8+/Z0Q==
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33E5016263D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33E5016263DPUEXCB1Bnante_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.6.10.111214
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:08:32 -0700
Cc: 'Tom Taylor' <tom111.taylor@bell.net>, "draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis@tools.ietf.org>, 'ZhangDong' <zhangdong_rh@huaweisymantec.com>, "fine_sz@huawei.com" <fine_sz@huawei.com>, Peter McCann <Peter.McCann@huawei.com>
Subject: [Int-area] Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier in Shared Address Deployments I-D
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:53:23 -0000

Dear all,

A new version of the draft taking into account the comments received in Prague (INTAREA and BEHAVE meetings) has been submitted:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02.txt

In particular, a new sub-section has been introduced to clarify the confusions related to privacy concerns.

As stated in the document, the purpose of this document is not to advocate for the practice to inject a HOST_ID but to analyse to what extent these solutions mitigate some of the issues documented in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-05 and to identify the side effects and the viability of the proposed solutions.

The document focuses on IPv4 address sharing (e.g., NAT44, DS-Lite, NAT64) but some issues may be valid for IPv6 too (e.g., hosts sharing the same /64).

We, authors of this document, would like to see this work progress within intarea or behave since these two WG seems to be concerned with these issues. Guidelines from BEHAVE and INTAREA chairs for the appropriate working to host this work are more than welcome.

Questions, comments, suggestions are welcome.

Cheers,
Med