Subject: Re: [Int-area] Discussion about Section 6.1 in draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <[email-masked]>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:34:49 +0000
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>

Ron, it is just a drop in the bucket compared with the amount of discussion since
"Fragmentation Considered Harmful (1987)". But, I think we now clearly see a
case where  fragmentation is *required*.

Thanks - Fred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 9:08 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Discussion about Section 6.1 in draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile
> 
> Folks,
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, 508 messages have been posted to this mailing list regarding draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile.
> 
> I wonder if that is a WG record?
> 
>                                                            Ron
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area