IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 17 September 2020 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512F43A0D69 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OA8-fJ5antow for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5913F3A0D6B for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1E48BB1; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:03:10 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1600358590; bh=myyR4S06PfQ2hdG2VONegaaXwrzxmI5gsA1yJP8NVSU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i411gGZL83kRBR5qWLH0yRW/7xEHDufkhyu/5h8Ix+qZLj9e9KDEljqjIY9mJ5Fku FP5ZX7fMlDw3bWv4HX0vWRxcCmwKkcLUV410jFsyQ1hpp9F+BzMtNMwYKfdrIY4WLw nQyHPpJ7LLGk9LBsSnapD7VRNVp6064qwo2+EQN4=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B30BAF; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:03:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:03:10 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028513083D501F28BCE9E191AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171802310.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <BA9AA3A6-AD8E-448C-8435-9861ED6DB844@cisco.com> <VI1P194MB02854BE1477807D40AD44E34AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200917140810.GA29793@nic.fr> <VI1P194MB0285AEE49C63F9DF0E18021FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAMGpriXM-uZOSxtWB4ALoRgcYR9nS+mn8Zc6qH=TLrYJdkRZSA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285A5F033CEF5385C2819C6AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009171657170.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se> <VI1P194MB0285B828AE12BF3614C06E2CAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35_MBozY6Hx=ajLz1hPQceVcw4-=NDgFQEQQn9UTgUm_A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB0285683F5088BF58EE2FFB8FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALx6S35i3dZtYGsdBx+xYQtpD94DjPvBUidWDJe6iii8XKQZmA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028513083D501F28BCE9E191AE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/H19eTATON1C7qumpeDlJcbhrOhA>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:03:20 -0000

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote:

> What about those who will have IPv6-only?! What will they do ?! Isn't this enough to convince you about the problem?

We have multiple solutions to that already. NAT64+464XLAT is one. It's 
already used by hundreds of millions of mobile devices around the world.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email