Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 07 March 2017 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C2512940F for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:36:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxQgz27gyWZH for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA19B12943D for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.184.171] ([128.9.184.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v27JZm7g005326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:35:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>, int-area@ietf.org
References: <CAHLBt8305z=iXg-_SOYh_FcqrFA=Vz-9FmfcTo=PnCviKGhPsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <c9f50569-3af5-8b4b-284b-de646d2d5210@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:35:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHLBt8305z=iXg-_SOYh_FcqrFA=Vz-9FmfcTo=PnCviKGhPsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A665FFB70FCEAA839AEE54D5"
X-MailScanner-ID: v27JZm7g005326
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/HH15NnglvaQQvrJzoW2ceOxing8>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:36:11 -0000

Hi, all,

I think it would be useful to include a section explaining what is meant
by broadcast and multicast, and the current state of these.  In
particular, highlighting the following as context for these considerations:

    - all 1's broadcast is supposed to never transit routers (RFC1812)

    - as a default, subnet-directed broadcast shouldn't be going past
routers either (RFC2644)

    - multicast in IPv6 may have limited scope (e.g., not all uses are
to "all-nodes")

    - duplicate address detection in IPv6 sends only to the multicast
group that would be joined by another party with the same address

    - relays, such as for DHCP, proxy ARP, etc., can extend the scope of
broadcast and multicast beyond the originator's original intent

These each limit (or extend) who can see a broadcast/multicast message -
and can be used in consideration of the extent to which information in
the message leaks out.

I.e., "all broadcast is not equal", and "all multicast is not equal".

Joe



On 3/6/2017 1:09 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote:
> Dear Int-Area WG,
>  
> A review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider has been published.
> Since there was good support for this document from the beginning and
> the new version addresses the pending comments, we believe it is ready
> for WG Last Call.
>  
> This email starts an Int-Area WG Last Call on:
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-02
>  
> Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send
> comments by 2017-03-20.
>  
> In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)":
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice? 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
>  
> Best,
>  
> Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad
> (Int-Area WG co-chairs)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area