Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Sat, 01 April 2017 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2C12964F for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skSaw86JtVzx for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBC912964B for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id p52so24619969wrc.2 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fu+3RnTEIoP9aUSBNQyAj25OGy5c7i7p8Gf/BpZ8H9s=; b=fHWm7Ii1Tm4jk42VYgjUDXzZ85PXJhYl6FwAErDl8jq8DTpoxI/LGBVcmJYM/fHdZN Juk17YnlqA0dRFriEFig2//yebpIGrIa+TGZFk2iWtBWy9ZabXdJLgWXw/Nm3fcSdj8L xsKWcMbGBQNG+hTjBXG/BIKu6ZtsxUiRz5rCG3dLZjUeuvtkhAxM5wFaHMcIVXqNjmOt k5IJoraxCdh1axfMpTSKknMP6pVIOxJQR4TdT/Tl1qu3IitdV0CPXMq2sTTSnLcrgesg LftjVgqgCT8CtsFI9n6fHlaKsww+bUbd4Dh7EqYd/SIoIaxagqDTNcDehRt7ESNhE22Z WvEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fu+3RnTEIoP9aUSBNQyAj25OGy5c7i7p8Gf/BpZ8H9s=; b=Yvof2xuOChxjQ1ejiT2wcr1BwF9Cwgas0nZT6LjCp9i5Nn7cLMmsu+R80ElT1Svu4Z PjLR4XxTQ1nvuLgEt7kermW2JHvygXgNNoDByqQaMZNGikSBa8Cbh7/038PnAlJp/pcT 5AcGZcDnVLH+jRR/zPNyZD1PTbS5YlJ7yY4Gmd598P23wrzN3agKXOjE4h9E11uaURmE JCLsERXBHVJ6OlrM2ACphj+mp1mgRH999nDSkio7UMhMAbbvTu2G/QjSsuVMudLl3nBM FjduNULsjn2FtdDdNcGQ4qIEbWDWNJIyL3LYIzJv9rS8dLZSK4FvvVgezaM5+IMcAzYk jxEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3mNEwUK3/CkDcsUzE/w0rgeS/v+hAkvb8s/MCVZ9+8UI2ejJ+ZQ5uEFlSSYgaQyA==
X-Received: by 10.223.136.246 with SMTP id g51mr7909885wrg.83.1491070921611; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.170.12.73] (82-132-241-90.dab.02.net. [82.132.241.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm7586075wmf.6.2017.04.01.11.22.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB22419F5D3B2D34A326E25C16BD360@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:21:54 -0500
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E01FBA67-D178-45B1-B203-2E5A8778CA9D@gmail.com>
References: <D502B93A.74992%lee@asgard.org> <AM4PR0401MB224189BDD22CD327CF280AA3BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703310806130.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1d67d033-8a0f-c7eb-ae37-ec99f5a34660@kit.edu> <AM4PR0401MB2241FCE296DCD88D7D065520BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35umePtAb-noP_CiXOh9Kf8j00oCVPSevci6EE9fyxTqQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB2241D2A7F373B24116E999BCBD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5fbcf078-4e05-3ea8-01a8-e0228659eb86@bogus.com> <AM4PR0401MB22419F5D3B2D34A326E25C16BD360@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/IPRfAF-dxeFBaF4VKNBU5_nHLB0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:22:05 -0000


On 1 Apr 2017, at 6:12 am, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> 
> 
> That's why all Internet hosts must be IPv10 hosts.

If all hosts can be made IPv10, they can all be made IPv6. Thereby reducing this to a previously solved problem.

... or should I have looked more closely at the posting date?

Stewart