Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-01

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 September 2010 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA62B3A6D20 for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSPgfLnq8mwO for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933413A6AF4 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so2201994bwz.31 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IPrvFLMSssAASOpwoUlW04QFCG0k29fFqoIP/U38BNw=; b=TOmwJsHsZfwZYRUBUd2jSEkxEG0tZSgK7YEnQvdeJuJC/OSlY23v1/tiJ+LcjpRHpX yCYHHc/UzK/i2A8pKkJUg3KXKHrbYRWPArDPBa51XVHjnKvk8U1t5ZQFhoVOStgEBIqF 7myo4cfLRmFj8fz8eZrpwNgW3+lFx/MgbCj5Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ggPI4Ojhw/dmNO/5wjeYpCaUufIvHWtMfg6dU29bpDcioXUlLiH2H9T7cLFwP5ilxr 1cveKICwDTBA2c7GVtnsDSM0mlcuG8mLfsfuxxVII8P+QRikuWfGi4llLwJLsMK6wFKc qdyiwi42dpPBkg2ZC/tCrMCL1Xxb5ncT6lboM=
Received: by 10.204.119.140 with SMTP id z12mr3030425bkq.203.1285880341554; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y19sm324185bkw.18.2010.09.30.13.58.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CA4FA1C.9080203@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:59:08 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
References: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F69EFF11E@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F69EFF11E@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues@tools.ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-01
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:58:16 -0000

Hi,

This is a very valuable document and I support it. Just a few
remarks:

I'm surprised that the list of issues doesn't include
session failure due to NAT state overflow or timeout
(when the NAT discards session state because it's run out
of resource). This is a real observable problem and
will presumably get worse with more intensive sharing.

>   [Placeholder for more details of impact of address sharing on
>    multicast deployments.]

That needs to be fixed.

> 22.  Security Considerations
> 
>    This memo does not define any protocol and raises no security issues.

I think that should be
  This memo does not define any protocol and therefore creates no new security issues.

Regards

     Brian

On 2010-10-01 08:23, Laganier, Julien wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> This note initiates a two weeks WG Last Call for http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-01
> 
> Please review the draft and send your comments to the mailing list before 2010-10-14 COB PST. Please also state whether or not you think the draft is ready to be forwarded to IESG for publication as an Informational RFC.
> 
> Thank you for your support.
> 
> --julien & christian
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>