Re: [Int-area] intarea status update before IETF-81

Julien & Scott,

At the last meeting, there was a scheduled timeslot for
IRON, but earlier presentations ran over and we ran out
of time. I would therefore assume that the missed timeslot
for IRON should carry over to this meeting, hence there is
something on our plate. Since IRON represents a proposed
major way forward for the Internet, it would also seem
that face to face discussion is necessary.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: int-area-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Laganier
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:52 AM
> To: int-area@ietf.org
> Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [Int-area] intarea status update before IETF-81
> 
> Folks,
> 
> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
> face to face discussion thus the INTAREA WG will not meet in Quebec.
> 
> Please see below the status for our current WG drafts:
> 
> Active:
> 
> - draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update => requested expert reviews,
> document shepherd working on-list with Joe to resolve issues that have
> been brought up.
> - draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required => currently in WGLC
> 
> IESG Processing:
> 
> - draft-ietf-intarea-router-alert-considerations => publication
> requested, currently resolving comments from sponsoring AD
> 
> RFC-Editor's Queue:
> 
> - draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations => in EDIT state.
> - draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues => in AUTH48, awaiting
> final approval from ADs.
> 
> Expired:
>        draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels => no activity.
> 
> Below is the status of email discussions regarding non-WG drafts:
> 
> - draft-fleischhauer-ipv4-addr-saving-00 => currently ongoing
> discussion regarding the usefulness of the proposal. No conclusion
> yet.
> 
> --julien & scott
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 