Re: [Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Thu, 20 July 2017 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A309131566 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBfrPVgvEVBC for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15F313157A for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wKiTUGsfknBP6zxbM5seF+dV8NzhQWiOGq9c9YUCcnM=; b=nzF/B5DOyaTecuR/MSVnSzmnu ZS89RzjGN8r9iAqOsF+V+QUG3u8RwmMghFpo8dlEgrcyBIomjEb8xLSY2kwJ/ioTtxjBuYk/7GS5g Q6RfshVWViQQhm2nwN2qlSwwPY7MUR4HgTXJLL4WxDpFON1sA0IdB1jZQdYGlNLEhsAvXG/Bc9ind QaVEnGc5v2/a04KUtO1o5Rm2v+mqFZvCjL62hhQCkvnnWi1UCLeVnciz8Rj0RlUWzFJndg1otcEl3 VpGz8wuij2xqnRlUBEPukK+UGCCvX16WBBULtSlStS+6l6K6k5BdjSarr1Us4UvsnI/nIC6kl8z8k GT/2t/7Vg==;
Received: from dhcp-80b8.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.128.184]:40274) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1dY7EO-00055Y-Av; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:54:48 +0100
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A00F869@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <3d5aa651-635e-adc1-bda4-e428553c3612@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:54:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A00F869@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0A1C240FDC6F8AC22CBDEB58"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/MhmqYUkI8oukpeDps6gvTqpHasw>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:54:54 -0000

Med,

Thx




Bob

On 20/07/17 09:11, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> You asked during your presentation whether SFC is to be marked as N/A.
>
> I confirm. SFC encapsulation is not a transport encapsulation. ECN 
> should be managed by the transport encapsulation used within an 
> SFC-enabled domain.
>
> You have a long list of encap protocols; it is actually cool to reduce 
> that list by one :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/