Re: [Int-area] [ih] Fwd: Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 21 September 2019 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2705120052 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgNTMHrN7AzM for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C0612004A for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id q7so5817583pfh.8 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aKErGAljoa3kupXGqNdrvVsArGQmtQNNTg4FWCusPJQ=; b=CF5urcMXzL2xiR/IqK1VP8WTL6Ve7eZZkoBd92Kvdt1RMdbkWJpIRkJiI6/bxRp/FD QQo2nmB02yh4QACa7lrsGy2nK5Hk6/rfvU2y0K4hjvseVn0q9QNthyNCT/CReHCZGcZ+ JnV7DGtmKeWfvh0vz5/GxCl1zG5OMzDFfGMsZCtySk4IRM75plKbEVppU+RbmpUzJzux Q0cO3TZbeGMJHtphcLcPRRf9I5c4+DYGDNrf1wzBEDKEubyWs3DxjzYUvB7PeM0JfFqK dH38DSPXC7e5WCayZJlTa78uX5KXUW5sBOO50X7Qi5Nh0gg4PflPuhynj+hlVM+uOh0F VtOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aKErGAljoa3kupXGqNdrvVsArGQmtQNNTg4FWCusPJQ=; b=IRry7qFpil8blG1GKBXADJb+T1UmTjrlI80e4tTtfZ/uTPwxDoDqCFHLAxboKD7BOL 04CmPD6kLfDQUlay5bqbdl2lnvK2EIZhkH6UQbqNZk2F6LKyEYmvM/wNMkKFTLX6jguH i+/sI7CTxTzKaMEW6d8lv9IHIfpimB5CZ4w5DNEiX7cTWI3dn3VHtSIPNNw+ExHkH2Yz EhwlFkCr5KsW4xZTbKRn2iWR8tnOILofufm3+1kjb3rq06fPtE1HOt10RbnMOd+/8CmD kwRfeb4vvLe5+a74tb+AodMiZBUXZ2bE5AmH26P4CACv8FHcgSTY4CCpNGEa5r+Tej/Z Td6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVZSklSB99MvQ9zUJ4lIVhaHiE4hQ26VwIg1AfafAzw0NY4Rdvz NhwAT4kcw+9LwfFINOcrU4lozcn5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyluI5RhduX/MR5o4phjL+53rlFUfMl1yqp22ZygkJUXy7E5FAA9OvihAa+2fIcHWupPJoLWw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c501:: with SMTP id k1mr8348665pjt.37.1569036235599; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm1906436pjq.18.2019.09.20.20.23.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Internet History <internet-history@postel.org>
References: <D6BD6D0F-9504-4533-BCFD-A79B2357BC96@cisco.com> <88ec7bdb-57e7-5966-6deb-b9e9ba8d7b67@gmail.com> <416.1568937724@hop.toad.com> <CAC8QAcfQd-n1bVWOhXRQEMW_Z=DPNzrYPUEdZrAHCL-MuXYXyQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0x8+jPWwHu1qTc-40zjrySKjAdVpSnMBWaTwPJ2nrJvg@mail.gmail.com> <9C35B8B2-B5CC-4BB5-AC4E-2F3C77AD1A7C@gmail.com> <E9F59590-C661-471A-82E4-00D82EC7CBC9@strayalpha.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2e48543a-b4f6-f136-3b0f-751dc7473e72@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 15:23:50 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E9F59590-C661-471A-82E4-00D82EC7CBC9@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ObPRoCK3loi54MLRK0onJAdv_kk>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [ih] Fwd: Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 03:23:58 -0000

On 21-Sep-19 14:11, Joe Touch wrote:
> FWIW, there are many registries with such “dead” entries.

114 is a bit special. By definition, all our normal traffic monitoring techniques will *never* see protocol 114 unless by chance they are installed on a layer 2 segment where it is in use. So even if no traces anywhere include it for ten years, we still can't assert that it is out of use. It seems harder to prove than most negatives :-).
 
> RFC6335 talks about the issue in trying to recover such entries.
> 
> In general, it recommends that even if they are recovered, at best they would be marked as “RESERVED” until other values have been assigned and the space requires reuse of those dead entries.
> 
> So the net effect is:
> a) the list will never actually reflect what is deployed (as Bob notes below)
> b) garbage-collecting will at best mark some subset as dead
> c) but the available entries won’t be reused until we run out anyway
> 
> Given the number of remaining entries, the task of garbage collection seems of little value.

Until the day when it seems urgent...

    Brian

> 
> Joe
> 
>> On Sep 20, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Andy,
>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Behcet,
>>>
>>> That was a historical list. The current assignments are in https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml . If you want to go garbage collecting, that's the place to start.
>>
>> It's difficult to tell which are no longer used.  For example, I was recently asked about the Reliable Data Protocol, it’s IANA assignment:
>>
>> 27	RDP	Reliable Data Protocol		[RFC908][Bob_Hinden]
>>
>> I assumed it was no longer used.   Later by happenstance, I learned it is specified by ETSI as mandatory to implement in eSIMs.  I had no idea.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> _______
>> internet-history mailing list
>> internet-history@mailman.postel.org
>> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>> Contact list-owner@mailman.postel.org for assistance.
> 
> _______
> internet-history mailing list
> internet-history@mailman.postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> Contact list-owner@mailman.postel.org for assistance.
>