IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE3512080B; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HocSiwmH3gdC; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E0D12013F; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rRXDQke7IBS8v14GBVECWDcEnKIlbB3oCAQ0p1bPcjg=; b=Fqc9Af9sjP0zxRIKjz3iQGN7o vB7ujEOG4kERX0to6fls7OMqnOEnipUdBd8v3zjA+iC4vLjBwZlaOp3iwNp/NprviV3B5fmCNbKjG xO/ORsvTlqIlwXSOlD903mfhji39n0pPsvvh0lgpcGwJteC8PUc7BRU3bY7jDkD05yVnWdtLOr/rf Rdr/1W8zcPOyuc7SAQu55OVhUsEMxCBchJjzSSmTxPgzz0R+adJdtOchVEuvYnvMsSCr3wDRDQ1sB LzC11WJ6vIaoAUC1Qei8Lit3JdhHnjGhtEvFfDxzOK7n0nHjlsIVhsWZSHgmq7juj5ogpNwUbqvxt 2hqr/l1sQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:62255 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1iEERd-004MCM-4X; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:15:41 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B4A133FD-7906-4A45-86E9-87E00778BF41"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <B09D69AB-B2AA-4FFE-9B31-F9D305A5D5DC@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:15:36 -0700
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "internet-history@postel.org" <internet-history@postel.org>
Message-Id: <A75530F3-CD8A-4ECF-9A74-D33E224D1E30@strayalpha.com>
References: <B09D69AB-B2AA-4FFE-9B31-F9D305A5D5DC@cisco.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/Sh95jXo6Wv9bQDdK27AnGHjZSaY>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Existing use of IP protocol 114 (any 0-hop protocol)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:15:55 -0000

Hi, Eric,

> On Sep 23, 2019, at 1:40 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Now, it would nice to have a volunteer to write a document to finally document those “Any bla” protocol number by putting common sense restrictions/constraints on them (protocols 9/IGP, 61/host internal, 63/local network, 68/distributed FS, 99/private encryption scheme, 114/0-hop).

For the same reasons Bob mentions, I think this isn’t needed.

We don’t need to encourage playing with these code points for experiments; better a protocol designer go through the standards-track process, at which point they can either use one of these codepoints or get a new one.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email