Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Fri, 02 June 2006 20:13 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1s-000605-3q; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1q-0005zv-M3 for int-area@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1p-0007Rb-Br for int-area@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400
Received: from [128.9.160.144] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.144]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id k52KCOI13258; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <44809BA2.2080305@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:12:18 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@iprg.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020830220.12705@netcore.fi> <4480438F.6030206@isi.edu> <44808B3F.6080904@iprg.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <44808B3F.6080904@iprg.nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: int-area@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1731674876=="
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Charles E. Perkins wrote: > > Hello Joe, > > I can verify that these two cases were not part of the discussion > that motivated the production of RFC 2003. Do you recall what was the case that motivates the condition ("IF") regarding how TTLs interact with forwarding on the head and tail of tunnels? Joe
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwar… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Bill Fenner
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch