Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Fri, 02 June 2006 20:13 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1s-000605-3q; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1q-0005zv-M3 for int-area@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmG1p-0007Rb-Br for int-area@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400
Received: from [128.9.160.144] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.144]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id k52KCOI13258; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <44809BA2.2080305@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:12:18 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@iprg.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020830220.12705@netcore.fi> <4480438F.6030206@isi.edu> <44808B3F.6080904@iprg.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <44808B3F.6080904@iprg.nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: int-area@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1731674876=="
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@lists.ietf.org


Charles E. Perkins wrote:
> 
> Hello Joe,
> 
> I can verify that these two cases were not part of the discussion
> that motivated the production of RFC 2003. 

Do you recall what was the case that motivates the condition ("IF")
regarding how TTLs interact with forwarding on the head and tail of tunnels?

Joe

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area