IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-omar-ipv10-01

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Sun, 02 April 2017 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59AE12704B for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 06:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.553
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXJKtsYDAerf for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 06:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092065077.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.65.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB47A120227 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=eX9UAWkCLUTe1G2BTleAsBA2ieGVTH8vdyVMnZvPxX4=; b=UY/ks+ZeM99j9FtaBqCa5OeGika16b4hilavzroXHXDDYYDLUIuIryQxIo9YMJBdm8zE0QZx6xY2Vl1uKUBexHA7VyxiHfIipyL4YylYcQ7PIhkL838MKpueBJFwe9qwUgZb2KPD5LsDMSdz5ANLIm+KMYJvDNfmiQGWdMmHLkWBV4bz69B1PYfimCVhQarEePh5+thfIMQIsWRoKKfrCeEjH0+Xm3Ix57sTYMjUwCo0gBk5ZmL213WvplRkoCjF8l55P78mPoF9VQWxH3SMo/gt5qOXb8r+z8vG+eLOyo7IqY01SnSeKb6LycviOjE6dn3olq6NiKQDg+DQvE59jw==
Received: from DB5EUR01FT060.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.58) by DB5EUR01HT186.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 13:24:29 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.4.60) by DB5EUR01FT060.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 13:24:29 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd5b:1ace:ba8d:6166]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bd5b:1ace:ba8d:6166%19]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.016; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 13:24:29 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Review of draft-omar-ipv10-01
Thread-Index: AQHSqz58sctllBpSK0+MvF+P5B9/NKGxL+YggAAUBoCAAM1FUA==
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 13:24:29 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB22411F718DB22F0A40CD529EBD090@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <68d4f945-8ece-45b0-ed4b-51847720740f@huitema.net> <AM4PR0401MB2241CF29FE45A94284D466A2BD090@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <d0750c9c-a761-5a71-deaa-68907d16a782@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <d0750c9c-a761-5a71-deaa-68907d16a782@huitema.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: huitema.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huitema.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:46D60CD25050B6F9AA2B5E32DB04A80C9741EEDE5720E3C7BE7E438E2F820699; UpperCasedChecksum:698B92251C90195A35EA57EA7822D7BBF3BD86AA9512B6B8F0981CD8C25055FA; SizeAsReceived:8283; Count:42
x-tmn: [hlYzTEI0RT1auGBwuLXVpuxyt9RCezN5]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT186; 5:5BrDakRsyyBdk4T6KYqXevCJMOZqwoSFpBGhELqDE4IIpIW0JH7+DesOdaaosLd35BlST4VBc0AtuQTNhikRf518VsRLVvVm8HnpE9Fw3BZ6DaCCPhFsCdq0MnS+Mtr4R6cBkInGwNntWwNEuzZXPg==; 24:F+WTrARb/cnSj9LxyvFQdQ9MJ7oFivrHgF/o4Mv3ZajjXL6b+/W6NwGBI8Q7cPZ2aS/oNWyQgno1c/aRi8+L8OEQU9w8r75TkIzmj0pWWPo=; 7:zX4K18ulYTj9slZKDpqCTN5YH5wCbThERyIuTxU+l5KCG1RSYwhlL8WWj9lzHAjhRAOZmil9g6Q+CZfYmdQ/d7H3s0NTN4/TrHI58dxv38AbjvTzclfv2UfFDi1elaBAzN446zFdq9eE6KPRcIsHgmSWPRmX+SZFdSU5KgyT/2J2P6qbWtkiDeLKbYj5wer/y9uVk/aDZObJF6I3J3MVC0WVDGCJRV3qM0G5ypVhWdEwLnGm26MAifAUweo4yOzhLJ0+TjGEFm5qFRzNvD3Gw4Zh8i+oU4K2p8mcaPVh1+GNDqg+C3u6ajcHRW7CHGhP
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT186; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 95b99812-85a4-4423-1a89-08d479cb9783
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT186;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT186; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT186;
x-forefront-prvs: 02652BD10A
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Apr 2017 13:24:29.1674 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT186
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/U6fY-1p5JbBqgnPRcLgD77hxt8I>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-omar-ipv10-01
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 13:24:34 -0000

> I understand that is what you are saying, but you are failing to listen to what others are telling you. If we could magically upgrade software and hardware on all legacy IPv4 nodes, we would have converted all of them to IPv6 long ago.

If there is a better solution introduced, I would follow it with pleasure.

> I am concerned by the way this discussion is going. Specifically, I am concerned that you will end up embittered by the rejection of your proposal. I have seen that happen before. A young researcher presents what he believes is a brilliant idea, reviewers point out major flaws, and after the rejection the young researchers either marginalizes himself, or abandons the field of networking. I would much rather help you work on your next proposal!

Rejecting my proposal is not my decision, I'm waiting for the official decision and will accept it regardless what it is, then I will make my decision regarding sharing my ideas with the IETF or not.


-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Huitema [mailto:huitema@huitema.net] 
Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 3:05 AM
To: Khaled Omar
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-omar-ipv10-01



On 4/1/2017 5:19 PM, Khaled Omar wrote:
> True, but you have to understand that there is no communication between IPv10 and IPv4 or IPv10 and IPv6, the communication is between IPv6 and IPv4, all should be IPv10 hosts.

I understand that is what you are saying, but you are failing to listen to what others are telling you. If we could magically upgrade software and hardware on all legacy IPv4 nodes, we would have converted all of them to IPv6 long ago.

I am concerned by the way this discussion is going. Specifically, I am concerned that you will end up embittered by the rejection of your proposal. I have seen that happen before. A young researcher presents what he believes is a brilliant idea, reviewers point out major flaws, and after the rejection the young researchers either marginalizes himself, or abandons the field of networking. I would much rather help you work on your next proposal!

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email