Re: [Int-area] Continuing the addressing discussion: what is an address anyway?

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2022 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117053A111E for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:03:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQgjvl05cjtu for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0AB3A111D for <Int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id m11-20020a17090a7f8b00b001beef6143a8so632506pjl.4 for <Int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:03:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bLHizhPUV18M7COIrWFD/py7SrtkoRhMEt5fl89++Ao=; b=X4k1wKM848H4Qvi0/PCZ3vyTZFaiXgC/eLtCBOo6dEmjPFLZqIVhCrddYfbQW92DHL pZETXZWnr9Gk4XGql+i1tiDhqzxK4lYm+ziphBI2RuHNhwV9CaZkXGIWzxyC/QCMVZKk ZH4UcmcIVM7ebCMBKZH0cm1wF0KFhbEtHDEKUcNabyzpxXRrH2uq9KwpYpkUzD5YF8lr XyJyV54F7g7Lk72+Y6b2ygumGXdwoErthgen839hXws0Tk9sa6J5hPXuFg57/qXpD4gW Plj3ZpU3Sq51cSJ1vIGxGzs/7E6Wa9eepIA1KS5OuzccZLnv02oNVMdF3HOh+R6AWy1w z+KA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bLHizhPUV18M7COIrWFD/py7SrtkoRhMEt5fl89++Ao=; b=p8ZbcJ8UdXt1vo3jdw0NXulzQbR2AHbecZKTMr1jtWQoh1/V5tLQm27K8fUTfgDk7z eqFavzw/fXUHIINfeapxaeqqgiQxLLrv3PsrMqTifle5HcpvUXdDK/c/7cT0RVkOGzNH aApntfoJhvM4dnaPTiDL1CQCoT2irhlHxU2ApjYfXJCfuWVZodjU3deaBRNPdfKzfGKe vGu3WV4kqon95ai7KvjEjhn2YXvJC1DBByLNg0DE18tAshLChZzHItiXpcwcMX6Njgfs o11Dn/5KMNnipbI7YqWwRCCudJhA79PMrho2l3DA2meMrk9fSP53xLUd4TPI7nuREq9B LfQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530affmeBzrGhWIIl9zZrO2rgrVVPCXhek9rUUIJQGvPe912KkJ6 xcw6CqfFnj7XnpQplfyC7XWyhLIzQmDpyQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7uvn9qopMt/d2iWCOTmk5fWxbz6oUbmdlA3mvoeCgbKToCd+TXk+VMjeSghHC/KLY2BoXTg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f68f:b0:151:fbf5:db45 with SMTP id l15-20020a170902f68f00b00151fbf5db45mr1517526plg.60.1646694223186; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-98-234-33-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.234.33.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9-20020a056a0021c900b004f72e3838aasm35378pfj.183.2022.03.07.15.03.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:03:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Gpm-qFUmOVey9DYUJV6S_UNYb02p7ANbT8rEjy8JA54B__1YeX6Uny2E16uEg_o-R7v9CWPdDbyOgNW7nJyACAbx7Ok99Q-zad1EsgYBerc=@interpeer.io>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 15:03:41 -0800
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "Int-area@ietf.org" <Int-area@ietf.org>, Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E826BB0-0945-4D7D-A483-F9A45AE70D9D@gmail.com>
References: <57c643c667d94a77b9917bb17dc142a5@huawei.com> <7de0956f-3fde-1543-405b-b635f6e69362@lear.ch> <Yh5M18z2/YVfpW7i@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <A771FFF8-43A8-4D84-8B6E-A3E7AF96644E@gmail.com> <YiBhOKIK9bMqwx0a@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <385CF477-C876-482F-ADFE-DAAD6CA7BAEC@gmail.com> <YiH6iHwv+U9QFA06@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <499a3364-7ea5-4268-cce3-43f010f36a72@gmail.com> <Gpm-qFUmOVey9DYUJV6S_UNYb02p7ANbT8rEjy8JA54B__1YeX6Uny2E16uEg_o-R7v9CWPdDbyOgNW7nJyACAbx7Ok99Q-zad1EsgYBerc=@interpeer.io>
To: Jens Finkhaeuser <jens@interpeer.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/Vyo-FacDHMwwmwoUTSgRCi9r6ao>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Continuing the addressing discussion: what is an address anyway?
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 23:03:49 -0000

> The addressing related point here is IMHO the RFC 6115 definition for identifiers may be more suitable for drone uses than the LISP-MN proposal treats EIDs: drones must carry static identifiers for authentication of control handover, while the EID assignment in the proposal reads to me as slightly more dynamic (though not as dynamic as RLOC assignment).

It can be dynamic but encouraged to be static, and simpler for management that way.

Dino