IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-00.txt

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 16 August 2018 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC46130F29 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6kGDlQa-mKB for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B532D12F295 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qlEfZIsd+Q3HwA2flPrXv6eCPK/tfH7NHyL/cbqV7kI=; b=N2icAkhI4vUqg7XwgT7J6seYw RuEVDIj7D/Krb2awCYCyuiT6P2dJdHJ4rGpY/sWRkgO8d5goCvgcXuNTkmQnj3d93iIjlbUSkq+pE FF8t+Rak2Xkx3iaHLx8q9MK6mM3Tl6OVVJqc7v/z0/juoHrqIBx4d0JsDeIwgKExQZA9vmTZF38Wd n7dLf+r+9GkYyY146gNknFo2mdlDhJ3JhHSoTpkbrl6xaJfKNSbnjPxLAKvTJinszrj7tZiea0HOk VaHMllbQaZWeGMwKXU9ZjNYXhqnjwMtVVFhcNS4nju77T0fVi5WchPElmhzaTJj5K6g/ZSW7jvzP7 2/dGK8SCg==;
Received: from [204.140.240.55] (port=49218 helo=[172.26.63.129]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1fqPUd-0011XR-FO; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:07:44 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <fe51ff36-f386-c48f-505d-1c2a55424924@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:07:41 -0700
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34496DF4-DF4A-433D-8ABD-DBE30C4BBA76@strayalpha.com>
References: <153434872145.14477.17942361917248825531@ietfa.amsl.com> <2c82b61e-8017-742e-764b-559f2ec4bd37@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808160735400.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se> <AE241D6E-2379-4EFB-802C-BFBC840273E7@employees.org> <2BB8A510-DEA7-4543-9FF4-6D82D5ADBA53@strayalpha.com> <66DE41F9-32D7-45F2-AADB-37DD19A5F5A5@employees.org> <F15BBC81-F3BF-4762-B27E-61A418EA8356@strayalpha.com> <D6F35FA4-6305-464B-A1A6-667E0CE30985@employees.org> <CALx6S3644Hyo3iz2VWCqOWOo8MTMBTgVVPxrsxv-SZ20D8nxbw@mail.gmail.com> <fe51ff36-f386-c48f-505d-1c2a55424924@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/XxOEY35vBj8yMBIztfS2BQy8od0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-00.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:07:48 -0000


On Aug 16, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>> IMO, the statement that "Networks MUST support IP level
>> fragmented packets." is appropriate. 
> 
> As a motto for the Internet, yes. For the present draft, not so much

Th draft can still advise how to adapt with ole still making this assertion. 

Ie, we recognize that MUST != DO

But it outright to also provide specific advice on how frag should be supported so that noncompliance net devices can be fixed too. 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email