Re: [Int-area] Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.

Khaled Omar <> Sun, 16 April 2017 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CEF1292D3; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.147
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id We-RDQ8ZoN3Q; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3AE126579; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=EuOFD2OEJmsrsM66IKsNfPUnBJ4eoA1dZcShCsrcHcc=; b=fh7Ehmjqqm7a8rHWvE7ESyvmqHjdrC7GtcouEBEhPzNbZdGGBI1P7H622ykDTIUda74RwIagdZy4uPIhQL1v5a7Ex1HbjjBNbz9ANqc1M4u/Wv3nEbGBFvpQLZSMsdYde3q7jz1JPc0EYqXFAGZ7jsqx62A0VBS5W6PSGNpF9ZY3kw+WxhBPTMDrEc0tEMlhCuJOPg2tvynAOg0Q2wkPs7+HH21uOkuOgR3i5YKmTNfqrOYckVkMKJdPZbGWzw1e5AcOR6j+vIN+JMH3cNq/FH9V3MR2jxopQ02DSpJ+PLCTxYilQNeddTZmTc74xwtrPx5/lZIvaVNPeOvCefLL+A==
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1019.14; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:31:04 +0000
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1019.14 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:31:04 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::167:4fb:cc08:25a5]) by ([fe80::167:4fb:cc08:25a5%19]) with mapi id 15.01.1034.013; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:31:04 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <>
To: "" <>
CC: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:31:03 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:C0F215908BE8B5C56269E4A52495D9B3326B0F6BA6F5374A0252CE77F5CD90EF; UpperCasedChecksum:A4C0D9C5D2FFB840E31F19C84FC6EBCF3A5DF52330D471E6B3734BD2309C85B2; SizeAsReceived:8230; Count:42
x-tmn: [wT48Fy/aVXCVUrlCR8Cj9t1hSjuOv75l]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR01HT069; 5:HwTFZYOpFDreqMOyGZYCVXO7YtAwHZU9+ZQufNdrrjqBLz6V9/RsbaJ/3hgEdxgNrhGAYBKB/MXgq7GQdhi74+WhBmLWTaNYTwMO+ayv8+NNeI7WtmdYI1c0ALK5R4zpwDOn+2ytlBiOi8c+4/qpww==; 24:1XgGwdeqJVegvBhvrFg8VKwhveqo/R8TpNxjpcLLs0sP/zhlhcWl7b8mhAX13YD34RcbgeFL/0FsKE9DczStcQEoLgVDlTp9sXmOs2lzWKE=; 7:CpkzxLbb8+lE0rlykbo87D5kOj5l8CRFoYgZnjYvRRNXBt2twZWt7OxZevTAf+YJba7SbxctUE1rlivNM+TmDX13NIdvjkdNtJXW/G3BRi7qNO+2JjhMGdb5Smc1qPRisEQexLZ38D19P9v372AgiQN49Ad4v7Wdexk+0OW0v7PoTTB7n0ITrYuvAFb8iBesap7fkMcBrSqZVRNeuHoXw0MkNyXlKHRHr47AUBouqhf0KzfJKNGt6iuUiRlET7BPJ38qDUFSAXPTttwfM/vZjXcm7kpkGrJUwdip3n6cIv7TFgTOHby6Wg00E2ZhdE7m
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT069;; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a590cf80-2a06-4663-0f66-08d484683f6a
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322274)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT069;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:HE1EUR01HT069; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR01HT069;
x-forefront-prvs: 0279B3DD0D
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Apr 2017 01:31:04.0592 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR01HT069
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:31:09 -0000

Hi Jordi,

Internet is a global network that covers the whole world (of course it is known by all), a single host that resides in one region should access resources everywhere, it will be a shame when this one host can access only resources from the same IP version that he uses.

It is good that IPv6 is deployed on the most well-known websites (such as Google, Facebook, etc.) but that doesn't mean that the Internet is only websites, there are many other resources (services), eventually all must be assigned an IP address.

The case is to allow IPv4 only hosts to communicate with IPv6 only hosts (for 6-to-6 and 4-to-4 is not the problem), so deploying a solution for that division problem should be introduced ASAP or the Internet will have a bad reputation due to the separation between hosts.

The IETF should take that responsibility over the shoulder, because think about those with IPv6 only address, they can access only 15% of the Internet, will they have to wait some other years to be able to access everything on the Internet, I don't think they should do that.

Anyway, I think the solution is on your hands now, the decision to publish it is not my responsibility, but I'm sure a solution will be found for this problem regardless it will be IPv10 or something else.

Best Regards,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf [] On Behalf Of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.

Stats are always a reference, but if you look only to a single data set, you will have a broken view.

Look at the data of the mobile operators in many countries, that only deliver IPv6 connectivity, such as US, India, few EU countries, now Japan, or even wireline providers in every continent of the world, that have IPv6 penetration figures much higher than what Google average is showing.

For those that work every day deploying IPv6 since many years ago, we have seen a trend change, the light at the end of the tunnel, already a few years ago.


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Int-area <> en nombre de Khaled Omar <> Responder a: <>
Fecha: sábado, 15 de abril de 2017, 19:52
Para: Christopher Morrow <>
CC: "" <>rg>, "" <>rg>, "" <>rg>, "" <>
Asunto: Re: [Int-area] Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.

    Hi Christopher,
    'what was said earlier' - citation requested.
    What I said means that since I wrote the IPv10 I-D on Google blogger, I wrote that the deployment of IPv6 is about 5% of the Internet traffic, and I got responses from some IETF members Just claiming that this is a wrong percentage and
     the real exceeds 60% and gave me some examples of mobile providers’ statistics.
    So, this Google statistics confirms what I had said earlier because I got this percent from some online statistics that belongs to the IP address assignment process.
    I would like to thank Google for the efforts made to make this measurements and provide a respectful and real statistics that describes the recent situation so we can make decisions based on it.
    Best Regards,
    Khaled Omar 
    From: []
    On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
    Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 7:16 PM
    To: Khaled Omar
    Cc: int-area; intarea-ads; ietf; intarea-chairs
    Subject: Re: Google Statistics for IPv6 adoption.
    On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Khaled Omar <> wrote:
    Hi all,
    Please check out this link that shows the statistics of the IPv6 adoption over the past 10 years maybe it will make you believe what was said earlier.
    'what was said earlier' - citation requested.

    Recent IPv6 adoption (April, 2017) is:
    14.83% Native - 0.03% 6to4 - 14.87% Total
    Best regards,
    Khaled Omar
    Int-area mailing list

IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.