IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 27 April 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F276112018C; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40Jt-YMjl6MK; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257D812015A; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CBmoxce9Y41f1lFpglVXx2yQb12UOQpKlz5BZEcF8SY=; b=PRbeUo1L3EuMx/J/VxjZ4ImHG SU1Z34IdNEDYO6bq0kcqYBafaVIW18PgSNuwsSsaVC0HgVQRBQNRPn8VbtzTRscIMAo6CbKXg/I9p vYnLlHDPs+/UbHEkVCLA/LmA8KK9QVIsUbev9uzpabfbNHPBqQdPeMjg+dhnJ6QIUAj7xeMAPPC2D n5/BBJudKnqPB4Y4oBGatsI+jO1iNeynh6aRPr+Px7JvPV3vsLjJqYJPjaezgFIUYV93m4+VhPONi upOb+QhpxGe+NDVjjRTBG4ozTdFr4jiPiYKb8n8HW6o6FlmUKSMfQ1vcF4ap5wdiosK7fGZkWPjct pU6AiwYgA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:50510 helo=[192.168.1.77]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1hKQtb-001x3G-RG; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:13:56 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2396DA2-7037-4414-8BB0-87F9202A2692"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363052958E@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:13:51 -0700
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <598B8434-3B6D-434A-B963-7FEE04D9770B@strayalpha.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363052958E@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ZfOCT-o-vzZkg6YbPwSIdoM6BAM>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:13:59 -0000

Cross-posting to let both communities know:

- it would be useful for these documents to address how fragmentation and reassembly affects these signals
	(esp. if reassembling fragments with different ECN values)

- it would be useful for these documents to consider draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels (which relates to the above) and its discussion on many of the protocols cited

Joe

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Black, David <David.Black@dell.com> wrote:
> 
> This may be of interest to INT folks who are interested in tunnels and encapsulations.
>  
> Comments by the WGLC deadline are encouraged, but comments after the deadline are ok, as they’d have to be dealt with anyway at IETF Last Call.
>  
> Thanks, --David
>  
> From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Black, David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:51 PM
> To: tsvwg@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
> Subject: [tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019
>  
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] 
> 
> This email announces a 2nd TSVWG Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on two drafts:
>  
> [1] Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that
>                              Encapsulate IP
>                 draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-12
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/>
> This draft is intended to become a Best Current Practice RFC
>  
> [2] Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers
>                           Separated by a Shim
>                  draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-08
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/>
> This draft is intended to become a Proposed Standard RFC.
>  
> This WGLC will run through the end of the day on Monday, May 6, 2019.
>  
> Comments should be sent to the tsvwg@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> list, although purely
> editorial comments may be sent directly to the author. Please cc: the
> WG chairs at tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>  if you would like the chairs to
> track such editorial comments as part of the WGLC process.
>  
> No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on either draft
>  
> Thanks,
> David, Gorry and Wes
> (TSVWG Co-Chairs)
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org <mailto:Int-area@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email