IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D5E3A1135; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56WYmPGoqVw6; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC883A1131; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id f1so2742612plo.13; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=+dhyMWdwVm+yevmyLXNRgHlW/qAnW639O8zUlWg6EZQ=; b=K7djOWt9fT+fV427E1w5Z+hEP1hmuc12jKzhRHnVBngyHCZG/tAWfxri72IGCSn21D bqIErOOKc7Bx6GqRI1DN0Gtu+YWa4LSDwdy4NiCm7kBSedSPRl6y4+0RSRh9UqfDUdBn peINRON9IHGPh8aBWeCB4UXtiICeKqPWSTNjfEDn3ECounfARuL0rqmOBqUdW7pu6Qz6 sr++dF2d/fdr9Ph5a66jaG8Q3pn2tw9VjIsmgLMdSN9Xq7CprOk8WAHSzqsYrv4lNYgs Jfd2y9gbLQn28mDMbA6hClH5HD7zbV8mM6Gm3l5WvCwnY+9q0OlS5f3fXd1Se6hlTB8t +jVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=+dhyMWdwVm+yevmyLXNRgHlW/qAnW639O8zUlWg6EZQ=; b=iguX0WTIDU/8hbh8g6LwJLP23stnpO3m3032jYIUu+BUfUZO1+MLRjSP736DqVzzXl TgwyLqdCmkfoYCSFQuhL2O5fiIrrp9oJPZE8I2M0Zi/KV7kAhewX8QJ19yFMaGIRbz8S Mrrr99M0lnhNBQcWHrAx0m2ADPA98bEq5VmksVkDbe96Gm406I/V5tjGXlJX4j4Z7uE/ SQRVyTJkfRvVXmioOxedLISuQ5q9ReJvcZtA4crB5XhrjbYOMHt2PEpTxH3TYE21LP3L AKEY7zOixp1Mv8j/ra6hSMNqY2dqvb/cIWc2SX9H1b2+XMz9Ry9j5I8NVFPjDMmYh0LP yVCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Nem2HGURwE5G1EKNnNZ1SF3h8f65hwzG34I428uSDf/vIK8Uo 6eG+6zXt2I8ia49hgQ6/HV8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyq3BFt6NC6BdF5oB2XlyUNE150s3Du1V4Egayq9TUfho1neTc56KDRhcUKOM88itUUY7bqew==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b117:b029:d1:e5e7:bdf5 with SMTP id q23-20020a170902b117b02900d1e5e7bdf5mr14143687plr.85.1600424670554; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([172.58.27.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm2556338pgm.80.2020.09.18.03.24.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Fred Baker <FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:24:27 -0700
Message-Id: <71AD5AC1-980B-4F48-8EAA-A491B833FC58@gmail.com>
References: <VI1P194MB028554C442513DABD41EB27FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Cc: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, intarea-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB028554C442513DABD41EB27FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18A373)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/_NV2ni3b8JDvjFIrcL0bQYy6N_M>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:24:32 -0000


Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 17, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Regarding the confusion, the community is curious about the idea, many people support it as it solves the problem that they think they are not part of it.

This statement has me a little confused. I see a lot of commentary, but I don’t see people commenting along those lines. I frankly see commentary similar to what I sent you declining a v6ops slot,

Who are these “many people”, and what problem do they see being solved?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email