Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 31 July 2014 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDB31A0054 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmB_uWeVas7q for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25FD61A0028 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,774,1400050800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="179307145"
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2014 12:45:53 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.76.239) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:52 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:51 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::39bf:b832:59af:53b9%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:51 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
Thread-Index: AQHPjA89VULaQL8SYEm1JGCv4zjXYpuuN8IAgAAEDwCADQijgIAACM+A
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:45:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9A9347CA-D614-4878-8EF3-7AF0471C694D@netapp.com>
References: <CFC8AC41.41E79%alissa@cooperw.in> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF6287695E1@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300396C7@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <63BA73CC-B475-4AD7-9EC3-5D6716060A8D@netapp.com> <53DA9585.2000901@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <53DA9585.2000901@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.37]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_62714126-4B99-46EC-8793-F3BD5407E9B2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/aKI61QPVC_78A8cs7JQGXUhZXLk
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:45:54 -0000

Hi Brandon,

On 2014-7-31, at 21:14, Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com> wrote:
> Has your read of RFC6967 been presented as the general int-area consensus in past discussions about the RFC? Or would there be some value in probing the list a bit more on the topic?

my takeaway from the RFC as certainly has not been confirmed as the consensus of the WG, and I did't mean to imply so. Establishing any consensus would be up to the chairs.

Lars