Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW
"Bill Fenner" <fenner@gmail.com> Sun, 04 June 2006 18:17 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmxAL-0001Vn-GO; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:17:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmxAK-0001Vi-I3 for int-area@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:17:32 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmxAI-00060c-BY for int-area@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:17:32 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i32so269139wra for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mhCW7GAVC8yDNKEiLvtZkJJeIo5zK5wc+yEv9SFlpSo7AINo4/v+ysUTrskX3ZARtDwNtFSrEp4OPn6sPxU+QYFljXVCdZ0nCICHbv+R6nSRgQYZxDAibOicYMsU5WU8tqB+tsyunuw47o3bjS9wYmzUoShzQGPXWcphGRX7DQA=
Received: by 10.65.15.5 with SMTP id s5mr2939561qbi; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.185.10 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2006 11:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ed6d469d0606041117o19fe5d69i8fe8901f98edca07@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:17:29 -0400
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwarding and BITW
In-Reply-To: <44809BA2.2080305@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020830220.12705@netcore.fi> <4480438F.6030206@isi.edu> <44808B3F.6080904@iprg.nokia.com> <44809BA2.2080305@isi.edu>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: int-area@ietf.org, "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@iprg.nokia.com>
X-BeenThere: int-area@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@lists.ietf.org
On 6/2/06, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote: > Do you recall what was the case that motivates the condition ("IF") > regarding how TTLs interact with forwarding on the head and tail of tunnels? I was only peripherally involved, but my recollection is that the intent was to make a host<->host tunnel look the same as a physical point-to-point interface. The TTL decrement that it refers to is simply the TTL decrement that you would perform during IP forwarding, and you're not doing IP forwarding if you originated the packet on the tunnel interface. (Talking about this is a little tough without shared terminology for some of these concepts. Steve Deering drew me a picture long, long ago which I always wanted to turn into ASCII art for an I-D but never did.) Given that, the BITW implementation should decrement the TTL if it thinks it's a router, or not if it is pretending to be part of the host. Bill _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when forwar… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Pekka Savola
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Bill Fenner
- Re: [Int-area] IP-in-IP, TTL decrementing when fo… Joe Touch