Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-12
Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 15:39 UTC
Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9617C3A10BE; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdTpCBdVW16w; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21743A10F5; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id m13so4790322qtk.13; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GYby7KlwG1I/M4SniqDgr6+J/K6i3MS9bgFiufw3Xdw=; b=Ww8EngSf74Mmt9fT8KIb1MkWGupg324og4qcUf+e6ij8xGFS+64ROfBVPimKGVVQe2 322TQn6BE1alYX4mdcRw8zUzjVHCuC76rzRZgJ94WLIENray5weCeClIrqKd4WUXqY4E hc9ieUwbtPpdR67+4bsySlFA2JOQNbP2kGgmucqyRY4QQhAcw/0z29Nc+/TVnIO8Nfuw 14YfuqGBmb3OVZ70sJN7mgcC3jUBlFMMTyR5CDSn8I+moLVIcsk6XYm/0X6pCEUFAb+V OasAx6VouRvKDeLF3JZjBZjhkoYDMMPoH5l83jp7m7HO6OW9dt0OrPE+PNvsvrLyC4yL 6kVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GYby7KlwG1I/M4SniqDgr6+J/K6i3MS9bgFiufw3Xdw=; b=FPJp4CGSvSTugbJxEzRkxf7bCUZW+1bByX3Sg4/ZnmjqI2TIJiwN20XPULYaIRqfmx 2wHAzMY7QBly/zVU3AcpuDMJ0OQhlTZMMdEHBNlF/zgmPw9wcDsvQUruFKslWVou7lXa oHCEr+hkIBlPsRKiMTSUbR06rJDRnUanTmiZ/eq0amJCOJe79XJ1E11eDRUJgsLXDpf9 02fH78mHYgGMdLGCpYCWjLRmtQWIgQ/Ovm+mbqg0k1IXZv9xc+TcvD2diNbaxefJ9qBi 4xUUOiUODjFVXr1Iov2n62NhA1Iy2VCXrSIUH514NAQ9+z18YUTG1Q5uCQrdC3Mizzwd noFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533onaQysQEFkWEFFMuXNdutf+Y1q5Y4x7OnwZ/31oK1UWR1ZND0 FnR8U6bqCGmz0+sLzsXjxMIsFDZc53OV/qfERmc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrILLt+tZfyw/y7khM9U9UeUmAUwZzvpIPeg9HF5BbNJ+ovn0oq+b2+VUqGfEhoL1hpHpME59SPGFjK7gPNog=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7757:: with SMTP id g23mr38513314qtu.46.1620920351250; Thu, 13 May 2021 08:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR11MB25479A9DA04F1D961A2A33ADCF599@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB25479A9DA04F1D961A2A33ADCF599@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:39:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkkj8o9ZAZcznNfSEGnt=fWH0UhDsgxNs6d22W89P7=Rfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bedda405c237ed42"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/g-4hrXZGWZj3EGnQ6cMvA8Tz3cY>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-12
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:39:31 -0000
Hi Bernie, Please find the update of the current draft. I am publishing a new version very shortly. Thanks for the review! Yours, Daniel On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:53 AM Bernie Volz (volz) <volz= 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi: > > Looking at this primarily from the DHCP perspective ... regarding > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/, > these DHCPv6 options are formatted properly (as per RFC7227 and standard > practices). > > I just have some nits: > - In 4.2, in the "option-code" description "DM Option" is used (only use). > Probably best if this was replaced with "Distributed Master Option"? (Yes, > DM is used in plenty of other places, but it seems odd to use it here as > the "name" of the option.) <mglt> done</mglt> > Also, "TDB3" in the IANA section does not use "DM". <mglt>changed to TBD2</mglt> > Also, 4.3 "option-code" uses "Reverse Distributed Master Option (TBD4)". > <mglt>changed to TBD3</mglt> > - In 4.3, the "Supported Transport" description says "DM". Should this be > "RDM", as this is the Reverse Distributed Master Server Option? > <mglt>correct, this has been changed to RDM.</mglt> > > And, something to ponder: > - In 5.3, is there any value in potentially allowing a Relay Agent to > supply these options to a server to potentially return to a client via the > RSOO option (RFC6422)? I raise this question as it seems no documents have > mentioned this and there was a case that recently came up where this was > useful for another option, so just want to remind folks that it exists and > to consider whether it could be used for these options. > > > I do plan to take a closer look at the other I-D as well, so may have > additional comments thereafter. > > - Bernie > > -----Original Message----- > From: dhcwg <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of STARK, BARBARA H > Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 9:56 AM > To: 'homenet@ietf.org' <homenet@ietf.org> > Cc: 'dhcwg@ietf.org' <dhcwg@ietf.org>; 'dns-privacy@ietf.org' < > dns-privacy@ietf.org>; 'int-area@ietf.org' <int-area@ietf.org> > Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC started > > Hi homenet, intarea, dhc, and dprive, > Homenet has started WGLC for > draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-14 and > draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-12. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ > (Simple Provisioning of Public Names for Residential Networks) > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/ > (DHCPv6 Options for Home Network Naming Authority) > > We're including intarea, dhc, and dprive to get a slightly wider audience > for the technical aspects of these drafts (dhc is specifically asked to > look at the dhc-options draft). > The drafts do also need some editorial fixing-up. I'll be focusing on that > so the technical experts can focus on the technical aspects. > > I've made the WGLCs for 3 weeks instead of the normal 2. I'm doing this > because > - we're reaching out to WGs that haven't seen this before and asking them > for comments > - there are 2 drafts > - I'm on vacation next week and was getting stressed out by everything I > need to get done by this Friday > > The meeting minutes (from the homenet April 23 interim) list intarea, > dprive, and dhc as other groups to request comments from. Is this the right > list? Are there others? > Please let me know if I should broaden this. > Thx, > Barbara > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
- Re: [Int-area] WGLC started -- draft-ietf-homenet… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Daniel Migault
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Daniel Migault
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Daniel Migault
- Re: [Int-area] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- draft-ietf… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [Int-area] [homenet] [dhcwg] WGLC started -- … Ray Hunter (v6ops)