IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] [v6ops] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft

otroan@employees.org Mon, 28 September 2020 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F2F3A10F9; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJsSyS9V_NyR; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D743A1110; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [IPv6:2a02:20c8:5921:100:2de6:4fbf:1ebd:fd33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B21924E11AB3; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:12:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4293EF58AD; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:12:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <20200928120340.GG2485@Space.Net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:12:35 +0200
Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <97C69C77-6749-4A0D-A505-0EBA70A35C80@employees.org>
References: <23754dfa24fc4b27b78b5b488af482d9@huawei.com> <VI1P194MB0285FF3B3CF2A79E8E383AE4AE360@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <33d76f27e0bd44b7aca946d7034b0b1f@huawei.com> <VI1P194MB02859DA3CB98195DA2E3E4ABAE350@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <ff4a6efdb99348b1a9756da629de6ed6@huawei.com> <VI1P194MB0285397B976F1A97AAC1AC33AE350@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200928120340.GG2485@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ggLvfQSZzJyHJBH0K8qnvgVJEp4>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [v6ops] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:12:47 -0000

Gert,

>> As I'm here on the list discussing it, we should come to a final conclusion and start working on making it official, just to have a clear mind with good intention and everything will be fine.
> 
> We have come to a conclusion: you present some running code, and then we
> start spending cycles on it.
> 
> Everybody who replied told you that it's not going to work the way you
> envisage.  To counter that, bring proof, in the form of running code.

I think it needs a little more than that.
In my opinion it needs to show how it can be incrementally deployable.
And easier incrementally deployable than just deploying IPv6.

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email