Re: [Int-area] [IPv6] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 08 June 2023 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4722BC1519B1; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNY2mqkX2ill; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E7BC1519A5; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 17:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Qc5Kh2M8Gz6J7tx; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:52:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 01:53:17 +0100
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi100010.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:53:15 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.023; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 08:53:15 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPv6] [Int-area] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback
Thread-Index: AQHZmPjt3L7fZ8/gvEmEHzyqVciKVq9/CqIAgAEJ1WA=
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:53:15 +0000
Message-ID: <b9e70bf88074447f9bd6cd967417f72d@huawei.com>
References: <CABUE3Xm5nT4R8wUu6FfXW0u66YoyDS45cRTuiGjRJ0CRGsevnQ@mail.gmail.com> <908A768F-F9CF-468A-A7C1-27736FE10BFE@gmail.com> <5B0C59DC-BD03-4BEE-A719-6E892F61F916@cisco.com> <CABUE3Xk--WodVbGFQtJvPTdtH154bNE6nufxoFDJuh6nVbpFRg@mail.gmail.com> <27866.1686157136@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <27866.1686157136@localhost>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.58]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/haQbqKpem2CDpJg2rtAtoPld2t0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [IPv6] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:53:25 -0000

Hi Michael,

What if we ask for symmetric request and response? I.e.,  carry reserved bytes in the request packet.

Tianran

-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 12:59 AM
To: int-area@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPv6] [Int-area] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback


Despite what the Security Considerations suggests, this still looks ripe for use as an amplication attack to me.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide