IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D02126C26 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iWPqjpcMr4x for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092064049.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.64.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC421293DA for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/bM3nF4EvArp0eyAQsUnh0I5JZ/C7Y04flG3yhlSgz0=; b=ASy+hJtEJv18NFU0NQrVkE16YDNog0gHWF9xYdnLLOHL63AwFG3jktyC8yNGlbYgqbVIyczDo28iVgWwMphxr59v9p8CLiIoAhMxCHwjLJX5w9SkzjqR8AU6HsePnZljAs8NDi5QOp2dP+96Wne7m7EicBid82t3p4Q0gFfJm0PZoJegqwFy+rOHFQ1KPsGuAnXWCLFIiIuCvi2mNo5VUiydtptYp3eXBFyMogkPU0O0fINN5yFEJTgzSGcO0g0YmJd2PT6Sp250SHjTb+ZJeYB/Tr94YYHwUEEAQl1Fs4qzgZ8t7zzL5xQRGrnv7+BrOb9wQ12kcztlO2qHpsNYag==
Received: from DB5EUR01FT056.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.54) by DB5EUR01HT200.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:46 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.4.53) by DB5EUR01FT056.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1005.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:45 +0000
Received: from AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) by AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.165.44.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0991.022; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:45 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
Thread-Index: AdKpViCv4ucVibQQSyGDqyi2P9NswAACadQA
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:45 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR0401MB22416ED9E2A95028C76D4896BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:A7F055E34AC329077B670FC9A4E2ABBEE11E675FBDAE9101E4CCB8E8B036B9F8; UpperCasedChecksum:CD5EB817F5A5CBF84FC29D454E4C3FD8902CCD73C9220C0C46B67F504AADC24D; SizeAsReceived:8036; Count:40
x-tmn: [eIrJtBTBXkQX+YFYvzcdswlT9XRkA3rH]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT200; 5:YfG0wFoJCnwU1Ilv24E+5c0Jhe7aWH2W/zQ6O88b3l3+rH5sHsDSaSW/j04WJqPQSBhJOJ62sAT9BdmkvHuNzg6RMPHLImWm7za+GUlQR6sLuur2BuuirYuiVGMOYtjKAupJIRuWVcmjPcMrnriDlA==; 24:/DR9r83CXues8actki/IGgWpLjtJkK+mOiIfu9VCdIDhYnYgwIR7eSysF3B/DBhEttXtWzDh5ueinpJfa2sAE4Y7d8sw6MMkSh6wRmXEv/o=; 7:7d9Nl7WAHBWWk4h8YPCqDhBYTC+BkENTQvM++ASMg0bghTBQl4BHM6kQ3GC+/9MVEzFZeCj7vurMt8fXRBrdwI6oqBpgxDYhrYJkzjYWAVJT6GetaKnq8C9zfgoONDaH00d+GGw0KTZytn7IUdt+XHYvUFxpYZrkRp3B7zRK/NkMIN5CNMqzhDOQ66nC8MVPwax1Wze70k65myk81CAczwJxQVOhVYwQuq5QoCAW24ynm96jTOmftBnRftjt3Y0gay1tYMj18wexlPVFDdMMLtXdEZrPbc1gUrHBpfQSCEfIPJQVNAjsg7aD89iVaAQk
x-incomingheadercount: 40
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT200; H:AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fbd4c66c-fed4-4eaa-d050-08d47778185e
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT200;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT200; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT200;
x-forefront-prvs: 02622CEF0A
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR0401MB22416ED9E2A95028C76D4896BD340AM4PR0401MB2241_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Mar 2017 14:21:45.4349 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ivJROzy2z2_Sl9V6lPCN49SqpJg>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:50 -0000

Hi,

I think time is an important factor in this discussion, we shouldn't wait until we find new InterNet clients don't have access to the whole internet or at least a limited access.

I encourage all of you to participate with your expertise to make the best final version.

You can find all details inserted within the IPv10 I-D and the presentation slides and make a decision regarding this discussion.

I cannot recognize whom are the destination audience but I'm sure all members within the Int-Area can participate and make a decision to make the Internet works better.

Best regards,

Khaled Omar


From: Khaled Omar
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:17 PM
To: 'int-area@ietf.org'
Cc: 'Juan Carlos Zuniga'; 'Wassim Haddad'; 'Suresh Krishnan'
Subject: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Hello,

Let's continue the IPv10 I-D discussion here as there was no opportunity to discuss it at the IETF 98 as it was clear in front of all of you that there were technical issues related to remote participation.

I think all of you now know about IPv10 and what is the problem and how IPv10 can solve it and how it can be deployed in a short time.

You can ask any question and I'll do my best to give you answers to make it clear for everyone so the IPv10 I-D can go forward through the IETF standardization process and be published.

All of you know that the migration process to IPv6 took longer than we expected and we shouldn't keep waiting more than that after the depletion of the IPv4 address space.

If there is a better solution for this problem I can participate freely on its discussion.

Best regards,

Khaled Omar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email