IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] About draft-templin-intarea-parcels

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 09 November 2022 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DED8C1522A2 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:47:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrKP6Qw_6SDN for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61333C14CE41 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 2A9FlRvb030096; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:47:31 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1668008851; bh=O8HmWkkdmKXeOMuo4+8GAARxDUeC+03NNL6rLHD7hfI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EnqW2RlTX5mmILQBFSmr3mCu8UxBTqi4rmOEgNIsCBL1ErpogdVvk6AdSeaAyfZ1n doO3Qkrqrm/PdRWvcuShCVKxb94n/TX5F1yHdEmqZme+c/wuQC2GnPinX/MIxjwAVQ AhoePgx9O1QFVXerBw30l7lMmwqFv8zvRCA0lXrgjH5CFQuHwCjBXi2r+Nka5YUTF1 93aLFaghqap2vtesTkQ3W5nOYSL6LKGH/HnGXBZU8ORFGErUAEpzltNzt6dekwFPqC Jf1b30JeqW9zutLh9hzeQJ1RexCz7xHax4YsRfWoPIoJAtHLxop+Jqmi5TIBbOQ5B5 7stbqEpdHXEWA==
Received: from XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-08.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.110]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 2A9FlMxY030000 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:47:22 -0500
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.12; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:47:19 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.012; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:47:19 -0800
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Richard Li <richard.li@futurewei.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About draft-templin-intarea-parcels
Thread-Index: AQHY9EVRtYZr/cK/v0Gn+qvCnZPha642tAHQ
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0000
Message-ID: <ba38e1e6fe9b45e78899feaba7d81e5a@boeing.com>
References: <SJ0PR11MB57692D589B130307F4C9C823D1B29@SJ0PR11MB5769.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR13MB2279C0291E3AC5998958824D87BD9@BYAPR13MB2279.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4c8d5f4708e449fbb2c1828b5b7f05af@boeing.com> <BYAPR13MB22794A6FEBD6EBF5EB900D16873E9@BYAPR13MB2279.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR13MB22794A6FEBD6EBF5EB900D16873E9@BYAPR13MB2279.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: 8EB6D876BAD89C80018B21D548C9E3F9055C1F243D5CADA345606EFE8E80AC232000:8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ba38e1e6fe9b45e78899feaba7d81e5aboeingcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/jFzmZk-W_EFYR12EJvnHvE0qQY0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] About draft-templin-intarea-parcels
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:47:41 -0000

Richard, thank you for your message. The intarea community must understand that
the live IP Parcels presentation given today was only a “roadmap” to a proper
presentation which could not be given due to time constraints. The charts shown
during the live presentation were skipped over quickly, but they provide full
detail and are permanently available here:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/slides-115-intarea-ip-parcels

Running code is also now permanently available here:

  https://github.com/fltemplin/ip-parcels

and provides clear evidence that IP parcels provide an appreciable performance
gain which cannot be ignored any longer.

IP parcels are good for the Internet, and the presentation charts and running code
provide clear evidence. It is time to adopt IP parcels.

Fred

From: Int-area <int-area-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Richard Li
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2022 6:12 AM
To: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: [Int-area] About draft-templin-intarea-parcels

Hi Chairs and All,

At today’s intarea meeting, the chair asked the participants if anybody has an interest in this draft or not. If nobody is interested, this draft will be closed, and if anyone is interested, he/she is asked to voice it on the mailing list.

As a follow up, I am expressing my interest in this draft, and would like to see this draft open and let it go on. A few months ago, I asked its authors several questions, and the authors answered and clarified them. I do see good values for some use cases, especially for those in broadband access and jumbo frames being used on the links. It seems to me that this draft points to a useful direction, some rooms are remaining for expansion though.

Thanks,

Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email