IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] GUE: IANA Considerations question

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 23 October 2019 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C219120982; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZT1KYDBmYfoC; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C1401209F1; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u4so7373177ljj.9; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fpmKuLffP25ojykPxIuPLacrQUqqkzTiSg7gj01zQ0k=; b=iaXcH20QSeh12S1YGYLbU0XX0gLqgw6VT6r1KDmc7q0Q6i31YZ19EyG+uU3Sj0xbqr CGny6ckizB8N7a9oyAPC1wJ3EROspsPxpyp4M03x7zLV7fokuAwyq2o7BD1GW84U8UJ7 PigyEJts0iiiBlWPSrWan9tFhW1R+ycPO1+sOxAHo8zfMYXuzmrBLVdXVmBLtyD+Qie6 PX4I8szYJApr4bg7ZEpjgssvO4shXFZlNzBp6vmHNQa8XqzAwQ5rRK2Xvt62OG959cb/ 9FpAAx1qHyPY+5HLo1VQpqttWMrhhdDx55Z+NtV41Z/xpcBRWH3srUzxgdKwF86Z+lBf IhJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fpmKuLffP25ojykPxIuPLacrQUqqkzTiSg7gj01zQ0k=; b=ltcYk7qriFtDIZowGw3EvEXnosnigZzeDScvON+u6ZY+XaYLtxj+rlY9nFl7SGNcg6 QX/ZQ7cAHA+IsqPDTb4lbVjXCjylA/ZIhAefy7DnLoGo4No8VzPhUDVuGsq29da4GWcD PDSL+PaCyY8cLESA9qnThIBEDw8fui4PUCkpA2L7LQBpmmAWYGMHssC1wq20nRdXJiZO gxIkSGhNipCiLl74g0fhWIjrG1HWzCUnxP3VnK00zHX+fnuxuR/0pLc+NYcJ07JezatC 4cNtR8Rbe3vckFbQ2IA1Hnm+diX8L2P5D72KXFFbR6C1DEiH/qdssNr4JbWeNEkvlSVt //EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXF8uLto2oPzAETMNqMbnhv31+xwXMl1ybOjzZHUifG2T0dejN2 7xx8hKN7gxBQlRWp1Blwaz8gxpiUgs0qg67LFOjh20zCwNM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyqQeH4zM3WGkAjX2Cp1OWIUuKGGua/ax+OoXa0YPVu1hiycm+X4Uqe8Am4CCgaY7dd5YdXcD+Q4kmntWisxKc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9205:: with SMTP id k5mr21532958ljg.246.1571843241411; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmW+XgBaYvOnKzfYiN63=JSf9Ckpe4Ga9oZtmdK+weppTQ@mail.gmail.com> <A8B171FC-77AB-49F7-9A8A-620B5671560D@gmail.com> <A4938F6F-39F4-4296-8A9C-30E17E12B173@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4938F6F-39F4-4296-8A9C-30E17E12B173@strayalpha.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:07:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVaYrqBpdogjZ+FB9uJoyhFm4pL117=o4gwhuCc35S6bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-intarea-gue@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000c09e9059595469f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/jtaC00JQeXzE4Emp44Wn5XrvJ4I>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] GUE: IANA Considerations question
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:07:35 -0000

Hi Joe,
I'll be happy with a single Experimental code point.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:50 AM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

> It would also be useful to understand why you think more than one code
> point is needed for experiments (vs the RFC6994-style approach).
>
> Joe
>
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Greg,
>
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Authors, et al.,
> I have a rather benign question the new registry requested in Section 8.3.
> The draft states that the whole 1-127 range is "RFC required" per RFC 5226.
> Firstly, a nit - RFC 5226 has been obsoleted by RFC 8126. My question is
> Would you agree to split the 128-255 range and set First Come First Served
> sub-range. For example:
>
>
> Please explain why you are proposing this change.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>      +----------------+------------------+---------------+
>      |  Control type  | Description      | Reference     |
>      +----------------+------------------+---------------+
>      | 0              | Control payload  | This document |
>      |                | needs more       |               |
>      |                | context for      |               |
>      |                | interpretation   |               |
>      |                |                  |               |
>      | 1..127         | Unassigned       |               |
>      |                |                  |               |
>      | 128..250       | First Come       | RFC 8126      |
>      |                | First Served     |               |
>      | 251..254       | Experimental     | This document |
>      |                |                  |               |
>      | 255            | Reserved         | This document |
>      |                |                  |               |
>      +----------------+------------------+---------------+
>
> Also, you may consider updating 0 as Reserved and assigning 1 as Control
> payload ...
> Much appreciate your consideration.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email