IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD673A0827; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 05:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRuATeA1VdZi; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 05:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092073052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.73.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F38A3A0825; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 05:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=IZ5kA7DO7nDixVlKwwNYAN2ow0mi2Ly5Vex8Zo3m3aH6PU6R0JUvVKWRb0Rz2YDVXCeXISLHHy8X3TO/BwFvUEWDG7TdfjfWvLxh/RfLhQ1qXIXPUFr4jXAy9mWyZybK/N1SmukGgs+PQQl4E8wZFwo6IRbQdS0NI9n0BWvzog49Jai2FcDT2Fc9C6tQKOwGC0XaZnsJ/VqRPVxraaUQtg+p0dTckp/SAmeE1EXKfpVQ1atneAXk7XLIrQ+FjDwSIaE7OfCW98SjQ9foER0KgrcIGKhiGFOVh70IrboQ74NVVAttfduL83rDp+kXk5Rjaontjwz95ZQAjvtAHSei/A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mqLZEAlPYvT1w+6F2NCXAN6xU4QpB68rc+pn4O7glQY=; b=cKCUcSLSDOn9MDJ1Sexajsu5wV56AJ/baX4QSVW53z2tiACOHNu0B39QnKmHgj2cCm6v53y8MPdsSXd9jgfrGTLDd+aDDgI26hlTDxCd0QGDMqKMYm8pPC2yeV3fm3yZdWq1ROqxC6RnfuR+sGOvCsbpCnRgffwub33wp0EJSk4RABciSirXFo3XVB4/66rBFgM/nZ+r4Kr3Gmibsr2Pjf+RbBZ+7TbRczs6/1xGO/OGBuSa3VuO4lSOlQTN6eXzoQj7UKbgROtnvLQbSDcqScAzWDfV7BJkrNt1hGwi+dUrm8rbcusW48j4+TVnOLJCuvI/mVr+ApqPo4QsxslYPQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mqLZEAlPYvT1w+6F2NCXAN6xU4QpB68rc+pn4O7glQY=; b=Yw6dI6r0WLgBVLjdhtqc0Qzobd7/kOQbtcuHJafOGFKoHxbKnIgqJw8mQ15tfVyZiPc2wfbwsZksMl9gt/CBTatF2XOUaeQS0c57kxcf67BrYEWKvkzzUiJlFqEloP2JV4/BRrWq8I3Ewoz3M+dz+apKpxz7Ki9ZRd3XSzDinpik2Z0KGzzSMfL0tUzU8B9B0KlYij6moUyythPW8mfBbnH3xqKScb6E98u9ZPpN9plJmoogl2dmuXkrACOHUXw+euXYZegCvhFVbTvJeh9qPmGQjC7ewa+6uco8xUd7TKW3Pwqlie1TuLFAnt/fb9eN5qzr/P2Y3Zq4E35neJbu1A==
Received: from DB3EUR04FT012.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::40) by DB3EUR04HT229.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:24:19 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::4e) by DB3EUR04FT012.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e0c::465) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:24:19 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.017; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:24:19 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
Thread-Index: AQHWjSq/zPsJZ7YUikO21h6CIi8HxqltUlfwgADfGYCAACCn4A==
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:24:18 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB02857AFEBE60A429F365F771AE3F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <VI1P194MB028554C442513DABD41EB27FAE3E0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <71AD5AC1-980B-4F48-8EAA-A491B833FC58@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <71AD5AC1-980B-4F48-8EAA-A491B833FC58@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:7C23B0EDD71B964CAAB84609F4D73A3455C228CF0F5083ECAE5037BA1447D5D7; UpperCasedChecksum:0D11FB02F0CE376530F002F88629D39EE8E9A42C4FBFFAF9B44DFB87669E19F4; SizeAsReceived:7273; Count:44
x-tmn: [jpvx+/aoEEj5NSvs0Xqa6gfn+8vV9xEw]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7c2df8c2-2991-436f-5bdf-08d85bcdc433
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3EUR04HT229:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: nh0lrZdTr1hkYMl9dkUO95hmXciOe9sw/JpTp6T8nYQ5XgM8hfliVF/dT8czspDEI9daw2PbA/PU+7NF82a4WelBQN9z81xzySTNT2q2n2CEiUH6mc/MNgSd6lUeA2OQhJxx/CcZf5wfi0dcEeBxh+7AoHXc+4aT5uqheI1BvrEdp7PVsOAPYCfDc7XhP8KEBwia+7n5ifJC8U/CL3ge2g==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: jKxBDxkd/PnFCLFKm6u+zIYtyMulRUUZF+IjsPID338m/tc56XWDaJLqvZnFW1NVTBTzr6A66l8CPpVXCM9VFel4XTRd+vbJ3PGzO6p0DP4REjwo6xBnSuaj8mPr/7CSehO+RC7AsBBMlPbv4Datyw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB3EUR04FT012.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7c2df8c2-2991-436f-5bdf-08d85bcdc433
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Sep 2020 12:24:18.9889 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3EUR04HT229
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/wSh2X45eI5SS3qMHZZg3uBzHoQ4>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:24:28 -0000

>> Who are these “many people”, and what problem do they see being solved?

Network engineers everywhere, they are waiting for the announcement of an official robust solution to the depletion of the IPv4 address space and the division that occurs recently on the Internet.

People read the draft and many wrote about it because the idea is simple and requires no intervention from their side, that’s why I ask the IETF to take the draft seriously and put personal benefits aside for now, as LATER everything will back to normal, believe me, all are in need for this.

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 12:24 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; int-area <int-area@ietf.org>; intarea-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10)



Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 17, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Regarding the confusion, the community is curious about the idea, many people support it as it solves the problem that they think they are not part of it.

This statement has me a little confused. I see a lot of commentary, but I don’t see people commenting along those lines. I frankly see commentary similar to what I sent you declining a v6ops slot,

Who are these “many people”, and what problem do they see being solved?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email