Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-06.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 29 January 2019 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6E2130FF1 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RobqTLCBxXft for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D5D130FEB for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id e5so9819188plb.5 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ov+6fzZhalLWznjKogglxIo3ogRt8jfOmdgUxRrn6pU=; b=inf/c9jKHXBo3ekTf4IoD9NXtyN//j34SNmoQWUblq3lOxSD+8HEaPyL9Vj6O9/URH VMp6KT2u7wFIc6nN0dZEjKrzL/suEfw15ERNu9MJ+tFR4zD2cFNVeKdY35M96GDHXoSC rBGjk/MUG0erJ66IBYUV0tPdybEoB3gpkAgaQk/gf+7GGeLLhJduMV5x3WMnHYqnIHjg ocHjY/VjHhD33w7Cd+n6k4+R4KQlvs4ux0NjdF/qB5XY0zyJh+EgMyntaU3kzrlv0kz6 hJP2eICnSzXRiDBAw8H7iAnNfS5B2uw0sbToy008K+5tujHk4BdsIjorrzok6JylRIJ5 Foqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ov+6fzZhalLWznjKogglxIo3ogRt8jfOmdgUxRrn6pU=; b=Cpwp5HTEOiyfgARFXbJdQAhIv83nBHP4HPxCrT2BjVlgrM3TGfmtQqMahn5gfdhx7M jSd+8Py26DMDAfHq5WDJRS+FxVM6lTBlHolxgjvvxIzM+Cxc9hZ90jbRS86WTIbuz70V WzIMLjcmNa7E9/odN6qJ5PTQOZePvlBc+vXbrpzRGxnRhph6en8IT8vWvCjUfgDowdU8 iak8zVG+O86BpFKFPQBC0POFrhVHNYqpmjVytGuWBNBb0+hV9B0PUiHERRxXayECUpYh 2fd8o/uRoVhnYWBIb2F9eggIs0F/dV0cnj5cfZ5KdCeBTo+pfVAPx1pWPoJ/5vEYmf8w EK5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukccgyhjmvTYFXZL2rV4W1OHYKIH96CUoPMqr1sfEGggsPJgW4PO mRfn9S6REo5F1+ZVEN4OQe7IAEFb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6svhtdcoOCwr+rIoTxCUtb6HAUfu8FBJQ1upHjDVmcvIvj4ARNdv2IjtjbxERMyR+64cfLaw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7448:: with SMTP id e8mr26404208plt.120.1548790845877; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([118.148.79.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u137sm60551937pfc.140.2019.01.29.11.40.44 for <int-area@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:45 -0800 (PST)
To: int-area@ietf.org
References: <154878591909.7335.12148879617430619328@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7bc33271-8cee-818a-036b-99d92d81847c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:40:39 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154878591909.7335.12148879617430619328@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/nbMjgwHSvMlr1zXxVsTNhURuGyg>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-06.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:40:49 -0000

Reviewing this version, I noticed the absence of one mitigation that we should probably be recommending.

- in section 4.4. "Stateless Load Balancers" add the remark that balancers that use *only* the IPv6 Source Address, IPv6 Destination Address and IPv6 Flow Label (when it is non-zero) work perfectly on fragmented traffic.

- in section 7. "Recommendations" add a subsection "To Load Balancer Developers and Operators" saying that load balancers (including ECMP/LAG) SHOULD be designed and configured to use *only* the IPv6 Source Address, IPv6 Destination Address and IPv6 Flow Label (when it is non-zero).

Regards
   Brian Carpenter