[Int-area] draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 15 March 2022 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1263A0B42 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXm0_CU7NXBF for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A14D3A0BCE for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24F762421481 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:07:28 +0000
References: <20220314204143.GF2515959@frotz.zork.net> <20220315185920.GM918607@frotz.zork.net> <af109588-9319-af86-36a3-917a9475ea55@gmail.com>
To: IETF intarea WG <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <af109588-9319-af86-36a3-917a9475ea55@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <65E1439A-5240-4828-9690-850575B9FFA8@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/q_v5drFKWlxW4-bHDdnxGYgM398>
Subject: [Int-area] draft-schoen-intarea-ietf-maintaining-ipv4
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:07:47 -0000


> On 15 Mar 2022, at 20:04, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> IMHO the draft is unnecessary and potentially harmful.

Well said! There is nothing to be gained from further consideration on this draft - or for the IETF to expend significant effort on the dregs of IPv4 space.

There is effectively no more IPv4 space to issue. Get over it.