[Int-area] Side meeting on Problems and Gap Analysis for Internet Addressing [WAS RE: I-D. Updates on Internet Addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis]

Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com> Mon, 25 October 2021 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037573A0C28 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQDnGFP_l9HZ for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1EB83A0C19 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HdKG63Ls6z67PQS for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 23:52:14 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemm000001.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.219) by fraeml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.15; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:56:43 +0200
Received: from lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.50) by kwepemm000001.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.15; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 23:56:41 +0800
Received: from lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.68.196]) by lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.68.196]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.015; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:56:39 +0100
From: Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen@huawei.com>
To: Jiayihao <jiayihao@huawei.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Side meeting on Problems and Gap Analysis for Internet Addressing [WAS RE: I-D. Updates on Internet Addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis]
Thread-Index: AdfJuMnYikbFYoe5TLGUICymbXsIaw==
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:56:39 +0000
Message-ID: <9886fdbaabe24a34bc423205b2383ab5@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.211.184]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9886fdbaabe24a34bc423205b2383ab5huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/shy-DAyktxtPAiB6jhdtw0q3HSs>
Subject: [Int-area] Side meeting on Problems and Gap Analysis for Internet Addressing [WAS RE: I-D. Updates on Internet Addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis]
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:56:58 -0000

Dear all,

You may have seen the update to our drafts on problem statement and gap analysis for Internet addressing, to be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/ and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/, respectively, as announced in the email below.

In order to further the engagement and feedback on this work, we are organizing a side meeting on Monday, the 8th of November, 2021 at 18.00 UTC (after the end of the regular sessions that day) that is focused on those drafts. After a brief introduction to set the stage, we will engage with a panel of experts on questions relating to the aspects raised in our drafts, those questions stemming from the viewpoints and work those experts have been doing in the past.

We expect to bring the ensuing discussions around those questions into the wider discussion on the INT area mailing list, helping us gauge the interest and support for the work we have been doing with those two drafts and understand possible ways forward for this work. To start this process, we will provide a summary of the side meeting in our presentation to the INT area WG on Tuesday, the 9th of November.

Further information on the detailed agenda, the list of experts confirmed, and any meeting material will be posted soon on the IETF side meeting wiki (https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/112sidemeetings).

Please do consider participating in this event to contribute to this important discussion on how to advance Internet addressing.

Best,

Dirk (on behalf of the drafts co-authors)


From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jiayihao
Sent: 25 October 2021 09:59
To: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: [Int-area] I-D. Updates on Internet Addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis

Dear all,

2 drafts around "internet addressing" have been updated recently, namely:

- Internet Addressing: Problem statements (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/)
- Internet Addressing: Gap analysis (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/)

The first draft (Problem statements) provides various issues regarding addressing in a number of scenarios, while the second draft (Gap Analysis) provides an analysis of extensions to identified key properties of Internet addressing.

We are soliciting feedback from IETF community on the problems, issues, and gaps identified in those drafts, e.g., in terms of issues missed, extensions (to Internet addressing) to be added but also towards the aim of these drafts to stimulate discussion on how we can progress Internet addressing for future uses.

Any comments on this topic are, definitely, always appreciated.

Thanks,
Yihao Jia (on behalf of all authors)