Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-05
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 21 March 2017 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA70129A58 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CGjzAr4QZtT6 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012821294A5 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.179] ([128.9.184.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2LN0HeB022351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chema Gonzalez <chema@berkeley.edu>, int-area@ietf.org
References: <CAEb0MfcqPsEukZr1m=0=w-mG4WSTU+G4WjzTTewyptt7GsaL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <ae8b47f9-6e95-713b-60b6-1d951ad3ebf3@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:00:17 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEb0MfcqPsEukZr1m=0=w-mG4WSTU+G4WjzTTewyptt7GsaL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------27DFA74042600024B5F3DE51"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/szXhfTaKK1Frh8cn3ycMSHDpEuc>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-05
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:01:00 -0000
On 3/14/2017 7:01 PM, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
> 2 minor comments:
>
> 1. There is a small typo. Where it says:
>
> B.1. Priveleged ports
>
> It should say:
>
> B.1. Privileged ports
>
> 2. Not sure whether this is right or not: Sections 3.3.2 and 5.4.1
> suggest the use of 94 as the next proto header value ("(proto =
> 94,IPIP)"). Both linux/include/uapi/linux/in.h and
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_protocol_numbers suggest the
> right ipip value is 4.
Wikipedia isn't authoritative; IANA is:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
> The wiki link suggests 94 was used by "KA9Q NOS
> compatible IP over IP tunneling", while the linux kernel points at
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-05.
This is a good reason to check with IANA. You'll find there:
94 IPIP IP-within-IP Encapsulation Protocol
[John_Ioannidis
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml#John_Ioannidis>]
See RFC1853, which explains why John has that assignment.
Joe
- Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3… Chema Gonzalez
- Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3… Joe Touch