Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 16 May 2017 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5191129B5F for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 16:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fAz9JVw91Tvi for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 16:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B35F126CE8 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 16:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.184] ([128.9.184.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v4GNsYwY008612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 May 2017 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
References: <149062888196.30638.8369941985115982808@ietfa.amsl.com> <f5ab0422-fd49-9082-147b-8312e974de7e@isi.edu> <4d2a86f4948c4dc49ab3b0729743d028@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <820fa41d-84d0-d835-93a1-caf11187bd11@isi.edu> <75148a50c6304ebc975cc2298abb73cd@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <ceb7fbae-2006-340e-e521-ce4d7be23690@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:54:34 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <75148a50c6304ebc975cc2298abb73cd@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/tQuflfldfhkoV5d8SKj02An3Gn0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 23:59:57 -0000


On 5/16/2017 4:24 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Interesting timing on this message, but see below:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:13 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
>> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>>
>> HI Fred,
>>
>> I'm in the process of the next update, and wanted to clarify the following:
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>> 18) Section 4.3.3, For Multipoint Tunnels, please cite AERO, as
>>>     well as ISATAP [RFC5214] and 6over4 [RFC2529]. They define
>>>     an NBMA multipoint tunnel framework that has been around a
>>>     lot longer than the other examples cited.
>> That section doesn't list examples of multipoint tunnels per se. It
>> lists systems that use multipoint tunnels (LISP, TRILL) and discusses
>> mechanisms that support multipoint tunnels (LANE, etc.).
> AERO embraces the tunnel as a link in the spirit of your document while
> LISP does not. AERO defines "AERO interface" and "AERO link" - LISP goes
> out of its way to avoid saying anything about interfaces or links.
>
>> I'm not sure there's a clearly good, original ref for multipoint tunnels
>> - the concept has been around in some form since basically the notion of
>> a tunnel.
> RFC2529 is the first I am aware of.
AOK - thanks.

Joe