Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03.txt
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 31 May 2017 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827DA129BB2 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0pHX_2n49jek for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B44129B9A for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.76] ([128.9.184.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v4VH992a014628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 May 2017 10:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de>, int-area@ietf.org
References: <149604303879.3966.14334001000021071156@ietfa.amsl.com> <8868c8ac-0bfa-8c98-69ca-0a932a986d4b@hs-augsburg.de>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <0abe6f0f-9379-7de1-15ae-f40598f5365f@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 10:09:10 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8868c8ac-0bfa-8c98-69ca-0a932a986d4b@hs-augsburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/uSdtvu674eiOh8aP9Lj5ZE-r974>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:12:27 -0000
Hi, Rolf, Thanks - yes, this addresses my concerns. Joe On 5/29/2017 12:39 AM, Rolf Winter wrote: > Hi, > > we updated the draft trying to address comments made by Joe and Tom. > > In particular we added a section on types and use of broadcast and > multicast. This is not an all encompassing summary of it, but > highlights the types most important for the scope of the document. We > did not include LANE as suggested, because we felt that this is > side-tracking the discussion a little. Also, we left out relays for > certain protocols, as the focus is on the standard broadcast and > multicast capabilities of the network which proprietary protocols will > need to use, as by design, there are no relays for these types of > protocols. > > Joe, could you check, whether the new text properly addresses your > comments or not? > > Thanks, > > Rolf > > Am 29.05.17 um 09:30 schrieb internet-drafts@ietf.org: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the >> IETF. >> >> Title : Privacy considerations for IP broadcast >> and multicast protocol designers >> Authors : Rolf Winter >> Michael Faath >> Fabian Weisshaar >> Filename : draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03.txt >> Pages : 13 >> Date : 2017-05-29 >> >> Abstract: >> A number of application-layer protocols make use of IP broadcasts or >> multicast messages for functions like local service discovery or >> name >> resolution. Some of these functions can only be implemented >> efficiently using such mechanisms. When using broadcasts or >> multicast messages, a passive observer in the same broadcast/ >> multicast domain can trivially record these messages and analyze >> their content. Therefore, broadcast/multicast protocol designers >> need to take special care when designing their protocols. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03 >> >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-03 >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> Int-area@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >> > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-broadca… internet-drafts
- Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-bro… Rolf Winter
- Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-bro… Joe Touch