IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Int-area] 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65511205FF for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=WiZsnOPh; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=emc.com header.b=as6Y+2Ez
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1bJxRxC231x for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00154904.pphosted.com (mx0a-00154904.pphosted.com [148.163.133.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E67A12025B for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0170393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00154904.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3QKnfS4029177 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dell.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=smtpout1; bh=8cw05KAqETJrLTxuMJ2UpScSjFCDXyBqe1rgHI4h1n0=; b=WiZsnOPhcM4VKaaVNnSAF1RfPU4vakUoxA34kv5IDVy64NKucmFPm7lkr+SohXXSk4V6 0G0jQ6uRjfaZ+rgl3uhR6wkP3q5fppL+5CWKz9td36bqLDq8Mu2p0KRDJCqtBaH1bUbT TPC/fkCgAyAZl/d8YoBz9jN/Qz+Xxn4sANglM7+IXQlY14ZmlaCTr1qei041lVRxIe9a QN+2eBYEh6wi9ZxP/LLhGwoTndBQ6z1ImCpLUokq3b/9bph6asKq6oG0aQ+DRCrrCOLa F2uLfxMdT+ahsF/mUn5UYbD36Tl5hViu5YzTYBIyaz0ESYo/kE9jXkrMmrq7QuASdVlC Qg==
Received: from mx0b-00154901.pphosted.com (mx0b-00154901.pphosted.com [67.231.157.37]) by mx0a-00154904.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s3t0h2t3y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:42 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (m0134318.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3QKleIo095486 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:41 -0400
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) by mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s47nr1f6u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:41 -0400
Received: from maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.156]) by mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id x3QKodT7019806 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:40 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com x3QKodT7019806
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1556311840; bh=l/CVwQGGOtnA3aCuV+lyGlfrESQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=as6Y+2EzybZzExotN8OQPwxHIz180e0lbEGBZMkIxv3lYHXLAJBQAUumojFDePzxc RZIaHNKjFsqKEtuvPCweExIjWHau71PSQR4zpoPHjs5+HP7BLmKX1/Tq9PztcB5hv2 OudXuZWEp7IxV2T1QMJt9tYwk1ajZvCmybArSUKM=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com x3QKodT7019806
Received: from mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.21]) by maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:33 -0400
Received: from MXHUB303.corp.emc.com (MXHUB303.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.29]) by mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id x3QKoRdx019604 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:31 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB303.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.29]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:29 -0400
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019
Thread-Index: AdT8ca3hX5dmI24+Qq2LBJHe4sNmhg==
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:50:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363052958E@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.21.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363052958EMX307CL04corpem_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-26_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=475 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904260138
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=524 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904260138
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/v6LRJn1MPaY3wpJ56bel3ZoLE30>
Subject: [Int-area] 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:50:46 -0000

This may be of interest to INT folks who are interested in tunnels and encapsulations.

Comments by the WGLC deadline are encouraged, but comments after the deadline are ok, as they'd have to be dealt with anyway at IETF Last Call.

Thanks, --David

From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Black, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:51 PM
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

This email announces a 2nd TSVWG Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on two drafts:



[1] Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that

                             Encapsulate IP

                draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-12

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/

This draft is intended to become a Best Current Practice RFC



[2] Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers

                          Separated by a Shim

                 draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-08

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/

This draft is intended to become a Proposed Standard RFC.



This WGLC will run through the end of the day on Monday, May 6, 2019.



Comments should be sent to the tsvwg@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> list, although purely

editorial comments may be sent directly to the author. Please cc: the

WG chairs at tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>  if you would like the chairs to

track such editorial comments as part of the WGLC process.



No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on either draft



Thanks,

David, Gorry and Wes

(TSVWG Co-Chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email