[Int-area] Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
Jiayihao <jiayihao@huawei.com> Fri, 16 July 2021 11:59 UTC
Return-Path: <jiayihao@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168823A33D7 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OojdlF81yFgr for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12DC3A33D9 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GR8Xs0vCDz6D8rq for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:44:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhreml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.193) by fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:59:01 +0200
Received: from dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) by lhreml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.193) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:58:59 +0100
Received: from dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.145]) by dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.145]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:58:57 +0800
From: Jiayihao <jiayihao@huawei.com>
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
Thread-Index: Add6OVL1ZxoKCG1fSb2qQjWIzsCQ+g==
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:58:57 +0000
Message-ID: <98cfef9be9484f879a5597927468f82d@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.233.142]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_98cfef9be9484f879a5597927468f82dhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/v9KGee-fx6tND__CCyf6uJ-xBtw>
Subject: [Int-area] Internet addressing: Problem statement and Gap analysis
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:59:10 -0000
Dear all, We have submitted two companion I-Ds on issues regarding Internet addressing, continuing the discussion on Internet addressing started at IETF110. The first draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/) provides an update on various communication scenarios and issues identified in those scenarios regarding addressing. Those issues lead ultimately to outlining a problem statement for a discussion to re-think the approach to extensions to Internet addressing. The second draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis/) builds on this problem statement by providing an analysis of extensions to identified key properties of Internet addressing. Those extensions are presented along various methodologies for realizing them and examples that have done so, while their existence is being seen as evidence for the existence of gaps to the original Internet addressing albeit filling those gaps through a plethora of point extensions rather than a coherent architectural approach. It is this point extension approach that has led to a number of issues, such as complexity, fragility, among others, that the draft outlines. We are soliciting feedback from this community on the problems, issues, and gaps identified in those drafts, e.g., in terms of issues missed, extensions (to Internet addressing) to be added but also towards the aim of these drafts to stimulate discussion on how we can progress Internet addressing for future uses. Best regards, Yihao Jia (on behalf of all authors)