Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.

Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB4412998B for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFf9HsrL_idc for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob14.registeredsite.com (atl4mhob14.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC299129A31 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.206]) by atl4mhob14.registeredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v2VGMpXi028745 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:22:51 -0400
Received: (qmail 12747 invoked by uid 0); 31 Mar 2017 16:22:51 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 31.133.145.251
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from unknown (HELO ?31.133.145.251?) (lee@asgard.org@31.133.145.251) by 0 with ESMTPA; 31 Mar 2017 16:22:50 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.2.170228
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:22:44 -0500
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
CC: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D503EBCF.74EB5%lee@asgard.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
References: <D502B93A.74992%lee@asgard.org> <AM4PR0401MB224189BDD22CD327CF280AA3BD340@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1703310806130.30226@uplift.swm.pp.se> <1d67d033-8a0f-c7eb-ae37-ec99f5a34660@kit.edu> <AM4PR0401MB2241FCE296DCD88D7D065520BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35umePtAb-noP_CiXOh9Kf8j00oCVPSevci6EE9fyxTqQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB2241D2A7F373B24116E999BCBD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAFU7BAS6qVBHNFjz0Lzs0m5JnC_ZvmWg_7MU6+6-VnMMPi1Z9w@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB22418580403CD59795AF3B0FBD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <D503E0B7.74E23%lee@asgard.org> <AM4PR0401MB224149E38D8AEEAF381349A6BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB224149E38D8AEEAF381349A6BD370@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="EUC-KR"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/w7-hAKKPUimf2G_pLTei4IH6Hn0>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Fw: Continuing IPv10 I-D discussion.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:23:00 -0000


On 3/31/17, 11:05 AM, "Khaled Omar" <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> I don¹t see any evidence that you are gaining consensus. Jen¹s
>>suggestion was very good: develop a stack and get some deployment
>>experience to show it can work.
>
>There are many people who likes IPv10 and support it,

We need to hear from them.

>also I'm not a software developer who works for a company developing an
>OS, if you don't believe that this idea works, you have to try it by
>yourself and get back to me with the result and what was your problem,
>maybe you are not good in writing codes or whatever.

I should spend time on something I don’t think will work?

The IETF runs on rough consensus and running code. This internet-draft has
neither. That doesn’t mean your contribution is unwelcome, but you
shouldn't become so attached to an idea that you can’t let it go when it
doesn’t have support.

Lee