IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] comment on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4571A1EF5 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:57:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddraOMGT-JzC for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0143.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3CC1A1EF4 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:57:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:57:30 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.16]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.16]) with mapi id 15.01.0106.007; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:57:30 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] comment on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
Thread-Index: AdBXbdfY1u3rjZCDS1GBQOYYyX4bpA==
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:57:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CO1PR05MB442AAF3B29AE72283B8B5C0AE1F0@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1PR05MB443;
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(164054003)(102836002)(62966003)(46102003)(122556002)(107886001)(99286002)(77156002)(33656002)(2656002)(86362001)(87936001)(92566002)(66066001)(512954002)(2501003)(76576001)(2900100001)(230783001)(74316001)(19580395003)(40100003)(54356999)(50986999)(19580405001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB443; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO1PR05MB4437E9EF15398EA6E0F456EAE1F0@CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5002007)(5005006); SRVR:CO1PR05MB443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CO1PR05MB443;
x-forefront-prvs: 05066DEDBB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Mar 2015 17:57:29.6223 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1PR05MB443
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/waUXJ2FZG-oPbAM_k0wPYf7QOQY>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] comment on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:57:34 -0000

Hi Lucy,

The goal of this draft is *not* to prove the GRE behaves identically with IPv6 as it does with IPv4. In fact, its goal is to point out the differences.

Can you think of any differences between the two GRE environments that we have failed to point out?

                                                                                                       Ron


> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:25:54 +0000
> From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
> To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Int-area] comment on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4545BB21@dfweml701-
> chm>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If this draft is to document the protocol of gre in IPv6 exact same as of gre in
> IPv4 and update rfc2784, IMHO, it should point out the gre application
> behavior differences in IPv4 network and IPv6 network. The exact same
> protocol does not mean the same behavior for an application since IPv4 and
> IPv6 networks have different behaviors such as header checksum.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lucy
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email