IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sun, 26 August 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C530126CB6; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWdYCZZeAJxR; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8380212008A; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bFHoliiUmFlhQVf/Iv5CDu2WppT0d5sHLjbj2wuOmEQ=; b=A/FaE2xj1AARfgD3KcLdRa7Ry VdzvwgKS/hC2Rfj0a9wtyDE96V9GflyNuPpQF7ZOwhAJj57GQcJNmSeskN9Jft/yNOOjibxxXTZti Gg3F948RObekQjXW1c1E00cOZ2gKeXh1Z4uiw0sFZgsp85gT9YX0X/lKIl+rFIaRoa3HGj+sf/z/s 6NzEw9yp+3Or+BtQ4nDXK8M+KiINoCJl3jLT/t8BC4cct6fFQPxCYoRQmo4VQj/zsVvrdkxh9uPF2 5pAkTxM72N3SCfPNfCHi65nRKQw7VIYgQnDP40Oluw7x8xAYATq6ca1KKiWfImf1hW1ZWu5u0HKgW DPQcphAkQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:60665 helo=[192.168.1.77]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1ftxcn-0033C7-Eb; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:10:50 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7CBCAD70-3BF6-4BCF-BC02-BB77EEA1EAB6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180825032457.ol5rlrr7h2kqi6px@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:54 -0700
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, intarea-chairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <B6127A45-8C16-444C-9851-EAC1BD80E54F@strayalpha.com>
References: <CALx6S36Ef3t7Axmx9hg994DHpVM=NdW-7ygf89E==gL4XKrkQg@mail.gmail.com> <5E21B3C1-0420-404C-9824-9B7E5A850BC5@employees.org> <CALx6S34qmKngi3hK_PVrJA1DMa5kfaLww3jfqRKN=up5v0Y0Ww@mail.gmail.com> <8D23C8B1-C2DA-4A8B-A2BE-8CCF6233B3A5@strayalpha.com> <D1D5EDCE-7C43-4CD8-947C-AA43CDB18892@employees.org> <1B04E207-08FA-400F-BBED-67379FEFD64E@strayalpha.com> <137751A3-7C52-4CCF-AE9C-B99C4A85EFC1@strayalpha.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808021749020.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CALx6S35kw2dodgG2L3LE3A5y8RYEXy6izQWgrQTwg7-yPqpzOg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808030857370.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20180825032457.ol5rlrr7h2kqi6px@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/xZ8UJr1FTtFHtHc1hX801FRbiOI>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 16:10:54 -0000


> On Aug 24, 2018, at 8:24 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Of course. Will take a decade to get ubiquitously deployed, but
> neither IPv4 nor IPv6 will go away, only the problems with fragmentation
> will become worse and work if we do not have an exit strategy like this.
> 
> If we don't try an exit strategy like this, we will just get what
> Joe said, the complete segmentation of the Internet with more and
> more L4 or even higher layer proxies

FWIW, what I said was that *this exit strategy* would lead to the complete segmentation of the Internet and its consequences.

Joe

v2.2.0 | Report a Bug | By Email