Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-rid-26

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Med:

WFM 😊

My understanding of normative references is a moving target. At the moment, I understand it means everything that is necessary to understand the spec, even if the spec does not MUST a behaviour or a format in the ref. And for things like architectures and problem statements, that means a lawful downref that the ADs will accept. That happened to me recently. But I'm fine either way, just asking.

Take care,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Sent: lundi 16 mai 2022 18:36
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-rid-26
> 
> Hi Pascal,
> 
> Many thanks for this detailed review. Much appreciated.
> 
> I trust Rob will reply to your various comments SOON. Please see one specific
> comment inline.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Pascal Thubert via Datatracker <[e-mail]> Envoyé : lundi
> > 16 mai 2022 15:30 À : [e-mail] Cc :
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; tm- [e-mail]
> > Objet : Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-rid-26
> >
> > Reviewer: Pascal Thubert
> > Review result: Ready with Nits
> >
> >
> [snip]
> >
> >
> >
> > > 10.2.  Informative References
> >
> >               unmanned-aerial-systems-serial-numbers>.
> >
> > >  [drip-architecture]
> >
> > Shouldn't be normative?
> 
> [Med] I understand the arch is a useful reading but, technically speaking,
> the arch I-D is not required to implement DETs.
> 
> >
> > >  [drip-authentication]
> >
> > Same, and then for registries?
> >
> >
> 
> [Med] No normative language is used when calling out these two I-Ds. These
> are provided for illustration purposes, hence the use of "e.g." or "in
> practice". Thank you.
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par
> erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les
> pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed,
> used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.