Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-11
Dirk Hugo <dirkvhugo@gmail.com> Thu, 25 April 2024 17:05 UTC
Return-Path: <dirkvhugo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD72C180B4F; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wCjuaHOiBkyv; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4C7C151073; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56e477db7fbso1772057a12.3; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714064738; x=1714669538; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uiAh92dRE6EL8lwiYniuWplmmpgSeFg2DsT5Eu0nRTI=; b=MOWzcgd/GrpWV0Y6uzKk73LoBfH9dZ1GY0Ew+o6UWKZ/WrKnQWbF8oxBrL9bPy4vn8 DAMkSta7lbqIyDTbQuF5fBRxZtBHbrqjDrMQMCr5NBOlGIbAwsDWAYLi+/MvFIukiKeg vPmRs86Vvdn7x5OaoyeY79DegGqtJQBJhWOi/t0RNVj1dl8IqhasVokZHYnKKqBVSgTG BG7n181bn1fu14dlXhxi4W/oHIF872WIUcZaMZvCrvUQpQKAG3vDU2tYES1brGlcDU5X 3QFPtYLSfJZ9j/IHTPATGAOIbx42umvm7F3JJNitckgbt/zRrGa976zRggaVfj8e/CQW V9Zg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714064738; x=1714669538; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=uiAh92dRE6EL8lwiYniuWplmmpgSeFg2DsT5Eu0nRTI=; b=loo/lcovrTFYlupRvXrJ8cYluoThNaOsQikaSxd3vIoTtGp8PrqPeK8JfrxoKyKM9U R/g+YVUt8jg0Dw3+KqdNugBVHBnrO4OnQjbEAFzERJxiVAVdFH9+mRrclABLQijx8IQy foVG6nCClLxgSnRXVOPd2JTT3yOyg8ADDRLWI3qpXim3WH23RKtW167ZExqEmnvuhkGV d75kKZg1NEBzlKyl/xVkOhiztQTHTZAMW8PQgq2XMtTG1jV76ID5TfCPhoyRAVLPhahg N1uOn7dm8QcGMXjioJPnbJHmwxpNMH4i9uE1xiNNbemEnorW/eFAmeYk2BenC9QUD/BR cgAw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUrI9gG1aF/c05RLGfGoUeG2Px7LI2IAjWH4WUMgt4/MgbwhplzBZXLBg49sgPVPOV0aEuIQFr5miP9QPxXKNVBI/RuthNyCAUOLCKKQvL3eXaqn3w/sBQQJ3+IISq4FMy+RkaS4H0Ifvk6FtLZ1Dbi+1V1q75auTHxjSSjY7net1MUrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzRAoEROdNz1MnmHzCUmER4GyO3fvv4voXWorH5T5+yVPHserLA IrAGesjvi5UvQT0qdljXiltydZcMELyF8FEmEDJSmQp8+49tu9SRzw+wv7NOQAfPgwbBT6nuEfm BXwNsXzZqkkbbz8Fqya6C1U37T7vyBg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFoduYF3+cIMyOBHZjZj/jiT9c4BoXwOjn753Qgjm69ySRY9HWUgEJLTVqH3d73YcT+ea/00VioFFzMIdUoGBU=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:954b:0:b0:572:3bcc:8370 with SMTP id v11-20020a50954b000000b005723bcc8370mr228176eda.0.1714064738150; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171405749974.58319.16841208632139291431@ietfa.amsl.com> <DU2PR02MB101607A203EF7C2E942C4D9C588172@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB101607A203EF7C2E942C4D9C588172@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dirk Hugo <dirkvhugo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:05:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJBtGruj7Y001sVWguGjRPm+X+RULCqtJsBhdcdJ43N3O==qjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6f0840616eecb8a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/DqJ2HlvsJB2Zv4j5eVJFECSUlLQ>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-11
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:05:44 -0000
Thanks Med, for quick clarification! I am fine with your resolution! Thanks and best regards Dirk On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:29 PM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Thank you for the review. > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> > > Envoyé : jeudi 25 avril 2024 17:05 > > À : int-dir@ietf.org > > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.all@ietf.org; last- > > call@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > Objet : Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo- > > v6eh-11 > > > > > > Reviewer: Dirk Von Hugo > > Review result: Ready > > > > Dear authors, intarea community, > > as assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix- > > tcpo-v6eh my comments were written primarily for the benefit of > > the Internet Area Directors. > > Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just > > like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors > > and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that > > have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see > > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% > > 2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fgroup%2Fintdir%2Fabout%2F&data=05%7C02%7 > > Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C69088306607a4d9da34a08dc6539177 > > b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638496543080533917 > > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB > > TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EV%2BJhw3oV1e1uAlwz > > Of4Jm%2FT%2Fatkbc91nf2rOKcbB3k%3D&reserved=0>. > > > > Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this > > document as YES. > > > > The content of vers. 11 has improved and the additional IE > > specifications as well the data type specification seem to me > > useful and reasonable. I couldn't detect any minor nits. > > > > Regarding sect. 8.4 I am not sure whether the term 'mirror' > > shouldn't be replaced by 'correspond' since only the protocol > > numbers are represented by identical values while 'Label' and > > 'Keyword' sometimes differ in this document and [IANA-Protocol]? > > [Med] I think the OLD is correct, especially that we provides how the > mirroring is done. > > > So I would suggest to say: The "Label" corresponds to the > > "keyword" of an EH as indicated in [IANA-Protocols], while the > > "Protocol Number" mirrors the "Protocol Number" in [IANA-EH] and > > [IANA-Protocols]. > > > > In addition I would like to clarify whether the term 'otherwise' > > in sect. 8.4 means 'in all other cases when not a new code is > > assigned to an IPv6 EH in [IANA-EH] but an existing code in the > > registry is proposed to be modified'? > > [Med] All other cases not allowed by mirroring. The nominal mode won't > involve a DE because mirroring will be sufficient to reflect (new, > modification, deprecate, etc.). "otherwise" is a catchup to cover cases > where modifications are local to the registry, not the parent one. For > example, we do have two entries for fragments, while only one protocol > number is used for fragments in the parent EH registry. Thanks. > > > > > Thanks a lot and best regards > > Dirk > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
- [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-o… Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ie… Dirk Hugo