Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B1D3A0BCC for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=TZYhKPTG; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=L9wXtxNn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gru7lwA5ttlE for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3013A0BCB for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 06:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4936; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1599658181; x=1600867781; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Oh7XYFTxB3Ept0+pxpUkI2Z+V+e8+H4Zd6fwXuZZZN4=; b=TZYhKPTGybUq/W4nLWLKe40GRvenQGcYBZPsMB2xvhgqe+nmKk/k8snj g9Ae8U8CY5J6Sl0fqZif11klXgC6MYR0VAUiu6q+r0tods42cA5wwmZ58 MBpsDpCZMK5y5gyVjtjsDlCmvTFL9AaCxqfNrytkJfY8g3RQGTEXjvADT 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A0cm0gxf6SXFIz/Mk0o6XrxYIlGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaQA9fZ6ulPzePd9b3jCiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFx?= =?us-ascii?q?oIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNF/TuXb05DVUBx?= =?us-ascii?q?asfQZwL/7+T4jVicn/3uuu+prVNgNPgjf1Yb57IBis6wvLscxDiop5IaF3wR?= =?us-ascii?q?zM8XY=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D4AQBy11hf/5NdJa1fDg8BAQEBCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?SAQUFAUCBPgUBCwGBUSkoB3BZLyyEOINGA41xmHGCUwNVCAMBAQEMAQEYCwo?= =?us-ascii?q?CBAEBhEsCF4F6AiQ3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVwMhXIBAQEBAgEBARA?= =?us-ascii?q?REQwBASkDBgUBCwQCAQgRAwECAQICJgICAiULFAEICAIEDgUigwQBgksDDiA?= =?us-ascii?q?BDqdsAoE5iBUBS3aBMoMBAQEFgkuCSBiCEAMGN1cqAYJwg2iGURuBQT+BESc?= =?us-ascii?q?cgk0+glwBAYFfBzECgl0zgi2TG6NTCoJllTKFAAMeoFayKAIEAgQFAg4BAQW?= =?us-ascii?q?BaiSBV3AVOyoBgj5QFwINV41IgSUBB4JEhRSFBD50NwIGAQkBAQMJfI1HAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,409,1592870400"; d="scan'208";a="572544509"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Sep 2020 13:29:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 089DTeWJ032292 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:29:40 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:29:40 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:29:39 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:29:39 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HJqQKI7KkIQkZL/xFDsfS4h2jj/OGZPxEV5QdVrW+OCucDuQwF9iDHTd3SddCANiGuD1zx8UFtQI/Q+vLmAdxyKs/0PjcJfhwN9l+WLKdYQcWyHcYq59ShlP9p4Hen367fG4+bZQngVHGW9B8qEtDFGYieBNAgmeeEpS/QFrUvryaDyDRXuoXd5cJlP1mWvm21+tpIn1s2JJZRknKF1CX/kKUieNUjyqdjWVMWIFGQhbIAOeA1IrM1kGoibKCnjDLLpv04CdFiGl9U2XW8Fd+a1Xdq2kCbqIQ5pgd+Z3yNIBb5br9VvrynaDgo9pDvOL7E2P6lxLHtMipKdupOtFow==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Oh7XYFTxB3Ept0+pxpUkI2Z+V+e8+H4Zd6fwXuZZZN4=; b=FsDxbc5C+uhYrJJf0L7nrprc2kEu+4UIxsXxfu0N5YysI66ZEd8+lUSh58NkAEogPzhUXLIoJto+gVnNT/GfwonCeBjBgEKLpt2jpd+LjK1F1KKGkUDuLI0wn59ibp8LOvUItgIvRecYOazBmY+Y3WMPDrUf6pH1z1TdFbKXJ909IiWVNWHZSh7unQEoDOeksi8N+Lp/wWa4SBWJmfPdsiKdRk4iAyM8MQpLQG7duMWghPhgNky9w3nK0ia1WDRYSRfpWS/YWpAw8glK5Uh5zdeljYDL5eZvBDCgagzGNzIV/VvsaUMm6a7PeRcsR6udqeKa4VyNaij0APvfAGPlnw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Oh7XYFTxB3Ept0+pxpUkI2Z+V+e8+H4Zd6fwXuZZZN4=; b=L9wXtxNnruFJ6ukwK9FERtJPHY1zkZ3q49fjUgAP79cb5W0JMq1SocCYLrxvdsEM4Rf6EAm2mjVhtwFHUq7sZfs4/5WfPE0Ts1a18aGxQlsmk/ooAlPBdbGJcTBoSmw1boRZNfHJz4wmM6g2l3FUOa2dLV6lLsgFXtiUDc2txsk=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:103::20) by BN6PR11MB0035.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:62::36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.25; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:29:38 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7]) by BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7%12]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:29:38 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
CC: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06
Thread-Index: AQHWgFQT8kq8HWsafU2NmOwDtlNkAKlgZeaA///wc4CAACUMgA==
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:29:38 +0000
Message-ID: <A6BFA505-F462-45B0-AB6D-2A7108634291@cisco.com>
References: <159896012981.17090.347340103586287782@ietfa.amsl.com> <6BE37D08-7958-4BF3-AAC9-3C7F071E5E25@cisco.com> <6A2C64FC-4747-49E0-986F-4DB66E565E29@jisc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <6A2C64FC-4747-49E0-986F-4DB66E565E29@jisc.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081000
authentication-results: jisc.ac.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;jisc.ac.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:e988:6ff5:3c2:7cc5]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b214b32c-db92-476e-86a7-08d854c466c9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB0035:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB0035D2FFCF0FF9C87D47EE76A9260@BN6PR11MB0035.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: rNI8n19FgVJ5msT5zPmkWRnC76dWCxstq3zHDPSxGCoyTEEIV+AlRImgu/RA5tEdNBrs0abs5BUAtQtDz7PIxIaWe2toXxbOWh36e+5ninleNLcTzOYic628wtrGaqp2ntN11uZUi8ZTji3+Wewtn8fRyQrCc+dXLYcCDy7Dv5mytcmKehgMqOeJEQM6SujOzot/wZsOgk30OQi8ye+WOzdtqM8PeQeqKZ4MzLhlW4Jnp4wTGxINLKVi0IB7Xl3Q3h6nUFoyfY30IIlYEMc3kwhfr+FTu3inc62/hdFxKLXwMR/uD4Vr5vx3AReB0f/Tkd9HMN3rnEeLcjyrIeHtQwAvwktUaAq5GlRMVWepm0FGtbUkcbFawXp3aE0+LJwpoZwd2PbMx5zGue/N17dUeA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(66946007)(64756008)(6916009)(8936002)(6486002)(66476007)(83380400001)(66556008)(66446008)(5660300002)(966005)(71200400001)(2906002)(76116006)(66574015)(8676002)(91956017)(478600001)(6512007)(316002)(53546011)(6506007)(2616005)(186003)(4326008)(86362001)(33656002)(36756003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <702C22CD68CBBB4E89A063BC110133CE@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b214b32c-db92-476e-86a7-08d854c466c9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Sep 2020 13:29:38.6222 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ado8usULQKAU9n3RFLk/x/YnLQ/BhqdV0gOWHuGWN5xJwjPd3aR1dy+uOGzhkE+/7EUoRR3iRQIHMocgS6WADQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB0035
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/PwZqpK32CJXlTSElr-4K3_qJwdE>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:29:51 -0000

Tim,

It is really never too late, if a review finds a critical issue after the publication is approved, then AUTH48 is the last stage where it can happen (possibly triggering another IETF Last Call though).

More generally, a document is placed on the IESG telechat around 2 weeks in advance so not  a lot of time (and some ADs also put a large document 4 days before...!) to do the review. Doing an IETF Last Call is somehow less convenient and sometimes too early as the document can still change a lot... 

Finally, for this specific document, it was a short one and no specific issue, so, no harm ;-)

Again, thank you for the review 

-éric

PS: you owe me and Bernie a beer next time we meet though ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Date: Wednesday, 9 September 2020 at 15:17
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06

    Hi Eric,

    Apologies for that Eric, I accepted the review on 16th August, the deadline was 25th August, but I was on vacation so was only able to complete it on the 1st Sep.  I was hoping the few days wouldn’t make a big difference, but I’ll look more carefully next time and either decline the assignment if I know I’m away or just treat the review as part of my holiday break :)

    I think for the assignment process it might also be helpful if the deadline was more than 12 days from the review being assigned, to allow for priority work items popping up or for holidays, though this was not a particularly complicated document to review.

    Best wishes,
    Tim

    > On 9 Sep 2020, at 13:12, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Tim
    > 
    > Thank you for the review.
    > 
    > For information, as the telechat for this document was 27th of August and as the IESG had the same conclusion as your review (= ready), it is now in the RFC Editor queue.
    > 
    > Kind suggestion to all Internet directorate reviewers : have a look at the data tracker to know when the telechat happens before reviewing the document ;-)
    > 
    > Regards
    > 
    > -éric
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Int-dir <int-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
    > Reply-To: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
    > Date: Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 13:36
    > To: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
    > Cc: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision.all@ietf.org>rg>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
    > Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06
    > 
    >    Reviewer: Tim Chown
    >    Review result: Ready
    > 
    >    Hi,
    > 
    >    This is a INT-DIR review of draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06.
    > 
    >    I am not very familiar with RFC5549, and not a subject matter expert, so found
    >    myself referring back to that document quite a lot, trying to get a clear view
    >    of the -bis differences.  I found the addition of a new Section 2 in the -05
    >    version with the key changes listed very helpful.
    > 
    >    I believe the document to be Ready for publication.
    > 
    >    Tim
    > 
    > 
    >    _______________________________________________
    >    Int-dir mailing list
    >    Int-dir@ietf.org
    >    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
    >