IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] side note RFC 4291 2nd par sec. 2.1 LL on loopback

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 17 April 2019 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA201201BB; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcqmeSg-kJaT; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC0D120158; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id w16so2277744wrl.1; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CouePohW2NUNUyvjrIr3oKCoaXYcn76zDoOOB1lbFRA=; b=WWtdflqgm5x+1PFOXZ80nJPNJMk6WUtmkZFLLentb9n0KiBeUb/7i4f+c3hClFTLIR waF8qXHLOZSgaASvBa1o6Aku/BX+NqA0fcgD02Q5ZB+oCAX5lfQYZ7FT67oDrR68mMQJ 63d6eCoMraRreBCRNq/9HMwWVES3YqrEqCQSh/V3+URTTcuVqjeUiBXa/LsjVzgTJ5OP M3U8tjPq34Z0JXm5Dx4meWrKLy5izuYgbI6Xz7xsumZhlPwOqABjpKLqeMoJSaISwq+L y8LeX9X0PhR7i/sIZCdR7vBli6jsuRYnUmuC1CL9U9QNWiZJwpmdfIZNwZYJTRWDYuiH jtCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCamW2XM+iV28N1U6yUqJHBzUywJX/t9SuFCgSzSy54LFobkAs Zo3XO1wdx/jReXB4xAhEhLNC2ffD0E3xgk2BlnQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySLvgB1fYNWhf+gjM78Ia1tuCbP00p4S9pyp65dZMDxAmi1MSjXHMhCMf7VLvKHuajBZutvABO5pRTqwbYUTo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1286:: with SMTP id f6mr23136157wrx.93.1555511242145; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <bcb6d12d-5b21-1f10-1afe-221321f8e7a6@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd5t77B5ij3ot-F-ucx5+3A7LATC-VTBx3w2_kCDD8fNA@mail.gmail.com> <35193c42-44ec-7337-56e6-84df6053843e@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdkhNFLg9ZT3uSFmjd-+5J78nQTQ8wKDHE8fe2v9Zn8Rg@mail.gmail.com> <35eeeddc-e861-d357-1468-dd853c53ea4d@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfDPom7+LunUD7XtmcE4kxFFBOcFVe+BgFNejdQNqDn=Q@mail.gmail.com> <973eaac2-9fe7-f438-c0e4-2eeafeec6087@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <973eaac2-9fe7-f438-c0e4-2eeafeec6087@gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:27:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqeA4xgfWmDQoMNDy86G+5g5HN2-XxHtHdong6Zn1DQ2rA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008455a0586baaf79"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/YJ0NhKBHaT0G8s_pq0OZGiOmiKQ>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] side note RFC 4291 2nd par sec. 2.1 LL on loopback
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:27:26 -0000

At Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:56:39 +0200,
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> [...]> Note also that MacOS is derived from BSD in case you don't
> > remember/know it.  And, in fact it also generates both "fe80::1" and
> > "::1" on the "lo0" interface.
>
> Right, I forgot that.
>
> But there is something I never knew for sure.
>
> Are BSD flavors supporting OCB options?

I don't know, but I don't think it matters here anyway: this particular
sub-thread is already an off-topic for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email