[Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05

Ralf Weber via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 28 August 2020 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6173A0DDD; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralf Weber via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.15.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159863212946.29977.4750468830482943318@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ralf Weber <rweber@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:28:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/a7p3WboZbUR6SqIoST3HezR6Dvg>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:28:50 -0000

Reviewer: Ralf Weber
Review result: Ready


I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.

These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see

The draft does a very good job explaining the motivation, definition and use of
the extended community flags with good and applicable examples. I personally
would have used stronger (MUST) language for the R and O bits set to 0 on the
IPv4->MAC transmission (3.1 sub point 2), but as these are optional anyway and
must be ignored by the receiver it really makes no difference.

So long