IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 12 January 2017 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EE2129442; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BRhuxpZokI4C; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128CE129435; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id u25so4395924qki.2; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3wAGyaYxKQLManmZq7r5ngCgFcE9I3MNbdtLqto4d8A=; b=qy12Nu7HoTWTZsjSZ18Gef3dQUvgDo+4f7FFH8Ca5RJYz67R6nlTTRhqjVbApba6BO MD9sAXV/DHd4LV85UhKTSSjmWgbJ4v4+srwXXoY2Istdi8y4SW+4UCS9Nejadm4FY2vC OGxgOCE0L0/NkUZRIeb7LVSjpLevZ/1J1ms8oiL3UQ3DZgjVP62SUL91zPmeJq1/uQPq ic7eqNnQzXaLM1SHN2nehpnEvH5gPF+cvVLq9wsEdlzgsJC5H8Jhiq7ZmgQjXmTl9gSg Lm6qhAKUkoaRA3EmgXFIjDHX5wuHAiQsWrRG75udXcyevmS/62pZE8a8lIGN/unAxsu4 APEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3wAGyaYxKQLManmZq7r5ngCgFcE9I3MNbdtLqto4d8A=; b=Rq1N2svxHqVcWAsTLQxwE187iphsp00eGV8y7pYaUQlfObaONbpGwk1padbAPBA/k+ 9huwK1ZCL/wI0O5NUX8r/yN/CvYQ41AR955hG1efsAQuYakcBABrSJ2dDP9lDpadCfRH n10lpaQCFzjg/APOmMQHKvzjYK7iCjr5rb5EIzsdRPRdDcYbQYbeNa+Wn8CNZzjzOiuB ilMDoTCclPm0nkamlEW0qNmIJqJTbPH5iMpU5GsXAsYvy8OH1g3kakVZEKftpCeHquXd MxftTIooenYAtE03kXsiiNmmIjZcT+cr+NKnAQM8sho+c2vUgmCpG/xGeL0UY3BXT5Zi FbYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLkLkK7KQpBdZHkJ2r/e5PhHerk+dUkpXmwqUFxVB60rz/tL/jSqScfn1hCUKfSaQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.100.88 with SMTP id y85mr14447119qkb.194.1484254321246; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f68sm3696330qkf.34.2017.01.12.12.51.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1817689823.74706.1484144674522@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:51:57 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <521A0BF3-E8C8-4523-8CA7-4243DFA9AE82@gmail.com>
References: <148406593094.22166.2894840062954191477.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1817689823.74706.1484144674522@mail.yahoo.com>
To: Punana Lebo <keopunana@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/tDJPD689gZda4yC_2oG6Kd_yQew>
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-06
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:52:04 -0000

Keolebogile,

You are correct.  I will fix in the next version.

Thanks,
Bob


> On Jan 11, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Punana Lebo <keopunana@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello
>  
> I am new to this and I hope my comment is appropriate
>  
> The examples in recommendation 7 and 8 in section 2.2.3 have been swapped. In other words, an example given for recommendation 7 (0:0:0:0:0:ffff:192.0.2.1 should be shown as ::ffff:192.0.2.1) must be  for recommendation 8 (2001:0db8:0000:cd30:0000:0000:0000:0000/60 should be shown as 2001:0db8:0:cd30::/60) and vise versa.
>  
> Regards
>  
> Keolebogile
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:32 PM, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Reviewer: Brian Haberman
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I just have a few comments/questions on this draft. Overall, it is in
> pretty good shape...
> 
> 1. Section 2.2.3 looks like a complete re-production of RFC 5952, but
> I don't see a reference to 5952. Is the intent to deprecate 5952 since
> its content is now contained within 4291bis?
> 
> 2. Section 2.6.1 captures some information about reserved IPv6
> multicast addresses, but not all of them. I think it would be
> beneficial to point to the IPv6 Multicast Address Allocation registry
> maintained by IANA, much like the way Section 2.3 points to the IANA
> registries.
> 
> 3. Also in Section 2.6.1, the names of reserved addresses, like "All
> Nodes Addresses", were made all lowercase. Was that intentional? Given
> that IANA refers to them with capitalization, it would seem that we
> need to be consistent. So, I would either retain the capitalization in
> this document or ensure that Section 3 directs IANA to update the
> names in the registries.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email