[Internetgovtech] IANA Transition (was: what *is* a succession plan?)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887741A00E4 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m5-A3sGiJ0Wu for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4281A00E1 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.232.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8CNahM9021096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1410565016; x=1410651416; bh=8Xz0oinXl+jX77co3CLqK/511N+MKxHO0bXuv/2qVTw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iBOabfcAIKMxIoc0+IfbANuLwBFn3jDTfURNtd5R4cC+FPrXtq2YHbHB7bdL8b8+7 EJaADU9O4NXYbruxH58Ub5V+3kM2vnjWIkkpe1Io/lGif7idcX4OHYvHT9hEDek5Ka OPyyq+sBndcRqOcPhGy8l9ptlpkHKFqp7re/3+uk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1410565016; x=1410651416; i=@elandsys.com; bh=8Xz0oinXl+jX77co3CLqK/511N+MKxHO0bXuv/2qVTw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=rm2LPoVsb+oucT7QX3lhGM9gHH0Rq81IoUXjzyJ6tOSETXr0Bjgxf0bSjpzYCrpMh JevcPq+uhmollhRzZvwhvx96BAbnhkzCmsp0kCrPsqr0I+RD8M+HA7XN7EI+68RhE5 sySoIIjF1+e3ChJeX8R9d0cpshucrlXyK5/z0WC0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140912141642.0e58f580@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:22:20 -0700
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, internetgovtech@iab.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <FD6E4678-8BFE-4FEF-AEBA-F052B0CEE9B2@virtualized.org>
References: <5411A084.20304@dcrocker.net> <54120BDB.4010703@gmail.com> <54120BDA.6030703@dcrocker.net> <CAJkfFBxhD9nOaLk2dhL=oftbAo0VbLrgEwjRXEHGW57fb37EZA@mail.gmail.com> <54123DFF.6050107@dcrocker.net> <89614FD0-5D50-411F-8BDE-B1E8C7F84E01@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140911220559.0cf51f20@resistor.net> <5412D9EE.5050902@meetinghouse.net> <5412EC1D.3080203@cisco.com> <54132E9C.9060701@meetinghouse.net> <20140912182809.GG83481@mx1.yitter.info> <FD6E4678-8BFE-4FEF-AEBA-F052B0CEE9B2@virtualized.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/2OqBfRZydP4i7ln_pNdpsdMmvkg
Subject: [Internetgovtech] IANA Transition (was: what *is* a succession plan?)
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 23:36:59 -0000

Hi David,

{I moved the thread from ianaplan@.  The subject line is meaningless.]

At 12:19 12-09-2014, David Conrad wrote:
>To be honest, a large proportion of this discussion has baffled 
>me.  It's as if people didn't really believe the "bottom up, (rough) 
>consensus driven" chorus they've been singing for _decades_.

Yes.

>That authority comes from the consent of the users of the services (aka

Here are a thread about the above: 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg76592.html  The 
term "consent of the governed" has been used since over 20 
years.  One source for the term is 
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html 
In some ways it emphasizes a difference in cultures.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy