IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F141A0A1D for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RrK6QsuG4I3X for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4301A0A20 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.142.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2DFGil2019525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1394723819; bh=U4e1ulfmcHNw3H99IFnYOwtcbC6Ydjnzbciwtue0am4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2HU/cjFG9EhivgFMjMHU5GVq7WDntEr6cHvxIuxz4xyajvIpFmuKcf12R+cxVEy8v 10mxBWB7C/VJE9gVchY5cVv44sB2At2XlNhjmfonqAcnzqbpW5BmSb6twnwtEDR0lB tfKJdTzqiYLzTnhNxPlK1Tj6LVGCZ4HSyDNDX2Lo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1394723819; i=@elandsys.com; bh=U4e1ulfmcHNw3H99IFnYOwtcbC6Ydjnzbciwtue0am4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=G7BBR69icnN9shS3BVFoFy1pvqPmW0FtR+AWNsKaZZIqBauinM4yk5TenR+BmbN2s D9It0YIsWehhmxJzA1wC+ewKaD1zOEQo1jHwlkgggCxeGEwXAs2y80dhYTeN8LNzpZ 9alrQQxS0pm1V9qrdrGTf/s2Xzjxu9l85/67BFGA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140313075853.0d5f9778@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:00:55 -0700
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk, gih@apnic.net, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E6334770@EXMB01CMS.surre y.ac.uk>
References: <53066F72.6080809@cisco.com> <CF2CB88C.1B2CA%alissa@cooperw.in> <53078600.3090104@cisco.com> <CF2CCDF6.1B3E7%alissa@cooperw.in> <53086568.7050707@cisco.com> <3FFD6830-DC12-4707-AE2B-0FE1F251B198@vigilsec.com> <530921E3.7060005@cisco.com> <DFC22E37-7FA1-4973-A804-73C00685419C@iab.org> <DF55C3B2-FF68-4001-B778-4CBC4354CAB6@iab.org> <39ED9EBA-C644-40A4-B45B-9764032CE277@apnic.net> <BA199E69-BA8D-4CFF-BEE4-DE444115C4D9@shinkuro.com> <0F0A2653-1FC8-475F-B123-01E96E26CECF@apnic.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633476A@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <3F12C9B5-61B6-4C28-B73A-320D80A6AE17@apnic.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140312231344.0c54d7b8@resistor.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E6334770@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/4Iv8YaEOyww-ZvxKWvuUQ5QC2AA
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:17:19 -0000

Hi Llyod,
At 01:12 13-03-2014, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
>Ah, RFC 6620 and RFC 4748.

Yes.  There might be a typo for RFC 6220.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email