Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 08:31 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D041A031A for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDz482CtTiYv for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BD01A00CF for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.155.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6M8VPk3009784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1406017900; x=1406104300; bh=2bVUhoMa+ju5qNRdNQWkINQZWTP/ubSPQlcaXUKEMO8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=fmpBFIiM7uNX4aIzN5/6oI4CaR0BIT9Rka0SBCyX6kaYX59TQmKkbaFPCZOxyZ8Xw Ii6GxGotyxQxqrDDd1MQZuBvghBzbWkrEXb2WBlJ1m6jvUB1hZO6mQcEJ2KeCUeTWs 3KBATl0mlqNwc1iOuJVZbh0HUhZzoFlxRbW2WLiw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1406017900; x=1406104300; i=@elandsys.com; bh=2bVUhoMa+ju5qNRdNQWkINQZWTP/ubSPQlcaXUKEMO8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=M7At9uWTGWndDFsK36pgvyMPPe4s426sZwJ27i+bu4n7Oz56qnzZUVMijNimSXg+V gsq8lQdFoVDskpnSl+DdszcutuWj+1FCJeFDkXRzAWDdacurGvGp3yLjw/6cBhgadB /WODk5Kdu7Gzc+TDdl6hkhuUV7/VcRKZfxrYDQoo=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140721232728.0cc67788@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:20:16 -0700
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dc6h_o9QNcj4O_6n78U1uDY_24OU1s5NRceUR_Dm97Q1ZdQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <CAD_dc6h_o9QNcj4O_6n78U1uDY_24OU1s5NRceUR_Dm97Q1ZdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/50tEVwdp1V8c12i1gsWzUD3SHhQ
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:31:58 -0000
Hi Seun, At 07:30 21-07-2014, Seun Ojedeji wrote: >This was one the concern i raised within the number community[1]. >The thing is the process is trying to be organisaed however the >attempt is making possibility of getting diverse contribution more >complex and less probable. The concern in that message was about the process for the various numbers communities. It isn't directly related to the protocol parameters registry. I'll mention that I have previously reviewed numbers-related requests in IETF drafts. Several persons who have posted on this thread (and another one) have an interest in names. They didn't mention concerns about the names side. I took a quick look at the proposed charter. According to that document the coordination group will be acting as a clearinghouse for proposals about the various IANA Functions. There is already some discussion in the IETF about the process for the protocol parameter Function. As I am already familiar with the IETF process I did not consider it as useful to ask questions about that process at this stage. One thing that I found odd is why this discussion is taking place on this IAB mailing list instead of the venues for the relevant communities. This is where I will get blamed for starting the (previous) off-topic thread. Please note that I do not have any concern about the following. The problem [1] is that the proposed (coordination) charter does not provide much information about the process. From that document: "The ICG will then put this proposal up for public comment involving a reasonable period of time for reviewing the draft proposal, analyzing and preparing supportive or critical comments. The ICG will then review these comments and determine whether modifications are required. If no modifications are needed, and the coordination group agrees, the proposal will be submitted to NTIA." If I was able to suggest something I would say: (a) Please don't use words such as "reasonable period of time". (b) Please don't use words such as "supportive or critical comments". (c) Please clarify how the comments will be reviewed. Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. I picked the first word that came to my mind.
- [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting … Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- [Internetgovtech] Cross community (was: Re: ICANN… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- [Internetgovtech] off topic: labels (was Re: Docu… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] off topic: labels (was Re: … Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- [Internetgovtech] Policy aspects (was: Cross comm… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Policy aspects (was: Cross … John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community JFC Morfin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Steve Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Steve Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eric Burger
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Jari Arkko