Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128E1A04F1 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTRXvu8k8fXF for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3A21A049C for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-bc45.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.188.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05B428A031 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:52:31 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:52:30 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: internetgovtech@iab.org
Message-ID: <20140721205230.GC19399@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <FA4238C4-ADDC-435F-9591-E3B074C2F6F6@vigilsec.com> <53CD2300.5050307@acm.org> <20140721143105.GH16966@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD4A4B.4090507@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <20140721174703.GB17107@mx1.yitter.info> <53CD6CBC.40804@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53CD6CBC.40804@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/A19wkVhPOGZePQ4hW6d0oGJyNgU
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:52:36 -0000

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:40:44PM -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> ICANN's purview", and I've pointed out that there are examples where
> the policy of the GNSO, the only ICANN ByLaws entity with
> responsibility for names policy, has been altered by third-parties.

Well, first, for the current discussion, I don't have a theory of how
policy development goes on inside ICANN, which is why I think the
discussions about that ought to live inside the relevant community.
But also, see John's remarks about the scope of all this.  I agree
with what he said, so I won't repeat it.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com