Re: [Internetgovtech] [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment

"Richard Hill" <> Mon, 11 August 2014 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E481A0661; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7RV6N1Z3qZq; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:1600:2:5:92b1:1cff:fe01:147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A506F1A0584; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Laurie ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7BGcTwf007920; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:38:35 +0200
From: "Richard Hill" <>
To: "Russ Housley" <>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:38:18 +0200
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0038_01CFB593.6BB09BB0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:42:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0000

Dear Russ,

I suppose that the proposal would be prefaced by a cover letter, so the
"final report" would be the cover letter plus conensus proposal (plus, if
needed, dissenting views).

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ianaplan []On Behalf Of Russ Housley
  Sent: lundi, 11. août 2014 14:33
  To:; Rhill@Alum. Mit. Edu
  Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment


  I do not understand your suggested edits to the first sentence.  At the
start, you seem to agree with the ICG that there is one (and only one)
deliverable.  Then, as your revised sentence goes on, your create a second
deliverable, a final report.


  On Aug 9, 2014, at 2:32 AM, Richard Hill wrote:

    Dear Alissa,

    Thank you for this.

    Please find attached my comments on the draft ICG charter.


      -----Original Message-----
      From: Ianaplan []On Behalf Of Alissa
      Sent: vendredi, 8. août 2014 23:32
      Subject: [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment


      There has been some discussion of the ICG charter on, and I think it’s the preference of Jari and myself
for further IETF/IAB discussion of the charter to happen there so we can
coalesce and reflect the results of that discussion back to the ICG. But if
people would rather submit comments individually and directly to the ICG,
information about how to do so is below.


      On 8/8/14, 2:12 PM, "Grace Abuhamad" <> wrote:

        The ICG has opened a public comment period for their charter that
will end on 15 August 2014 at 23:59 UTC.

        Public comment submission process links:

        Comment submission:
        List of comments submitted via this site:
-17jun14-en.pdf [PDF, 43.7 KB]
        Deadline: August 15, 2014 at 23:59 UTC

        Please view the full announcement here:
        _______________________________________________ ianatransition
mailing list
    <IANA ICG charter r1.pdf>_______________________________________________
    Ianaplan mailing list