Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available

[John Curran <[e-mail]>]

On Jul 21, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:

> The IETF community will be responsible for the proposal for protocol parameters. I expect that interested individuals will be working with the name community or the numbers community to make sure that the right things are happening in each of those proposals as well.  Coordination will be needed where there is overlap, such as anycast addresses and special-purpose names.  That said, once the whole proposal is stitched together, it will be reviewed by all three communities and many other interested parties.

This is a reasonable approach, given that there is a dedicated coordinating
group that can facilitate the necessary review and coordination steps to make 
a consistent proposal. It would also be helpful if an IAB/IETF IANA framework 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-iana-framework-02> for all of the IETF
registries (i.e. technical "protocol parameter" ones, more "general purpose" 
registries of DNS root zone, IP address spaces, ASN spaces, etc.) were to 
be published, as this would help make plain the IETF's generic expectations 
for the registries component of its successful Internet protocol development
efforts.

Thanks!
/John

Disclaimer: My views alone.