Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Wed, 09 July 2014 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49C1A045D for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6gask7RuXKD for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217931A0452 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c11so5288464lbj.41 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0jbR6uRhKTNW+20v9LOryeGdQ6FU82EU7yXFcAyo4fM=; b=lLkerJ0PXp+jvnzB/J8KccAS3TU601kcntmsyelWzxFVVLNEqQDd+Pu0ekJJfW9VIM lUz2w07P/kFFMTsupaEPqbUZFjZE0ed8Dme61vXbM+GL8Alb3v0a5kpnGFwsHA1nSINO YEogn/MPjdTKIAj3/X4aLBX2WHm2YwEb71ZrXA3b6brA9V9YBgog4m6hFAhNKfm7FOc0 gWJwfb+0jALKeKhM6pcNsXSdrbStWjLZkuTKIqAqBdTqWomUTUapQVYy4vbHPnliZaHx FcyQZhlf/ZTgvp+jNNodmeJaUFTsgzG6OEIOaLufidywmRJ+8I7EU0XxQ1/TTm3i3TVB +rcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.134.40 with SMTP id ph8mr15434701lbb.34.1404935111130; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.171.129 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53BD96CD.3030402@schiefner.de>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org> <53BD96CD.3030402@schiefner.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:45:11 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+z-_EXG8jaork6fhCwnp969VY2G7nBvnwrRsr5MEPcesXRGOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Schiefner <carsten@schiefner.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a7eac3b457704fdc7f2c9"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/HbTNwSCqRc_tK4YA9l4385hvwgs
Cc: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@lstamour.org>, "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: carlos@lacnic.net
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:45:17 -0000

It'd be quite worrying if ICANN is becoming an organisation where middle
management are who actually make these important decisions without proper
oversight. Several examples come to mind, none of them good.

I support Lynn's idea.

regards

-Carlos


On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Carsten Schiefner <carsten@schiefner.de>
wrote:

> Hi Lynn,
>
>
> On 09.07.2014 21:18, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
>
>> In thinking about how to turn this around, what if a few key people
>> (say IETF and IAB Chairs) were to write to Fadi and some of his key
>> advisors and suggest they reconsider their recent actions given how
>> counter this is to so many principles.  ICANN senior staff may just
>> not be aware of this.
>>
>
> that indeed might be the case - that's why I'd support your take on this.
>
> It however puts another question on the table: how "senior" @ ICANN one
> does need to be to be or become aware of it *before* actually taking action
> as we have seen?
>
> Best,
>
>         -C.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
>



-- 
--
=========================
Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
h <http://cagnazzo.name>ttp://cagnazzo.me
=========================